Is Marilyn Mosby Prosecutor in the Freddie Gray Case Ignorant or Corrupt?

May 6, 2015
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 20:10 PM

0mosbyIt appears that what Ms. Mosby states as FACT in the Gray case are based on her whims or wishes rather than reality.

I suppose the question is why?
Is she actually ignorant of the law?
Has she failed to do her own research if she is rusty?
Is she relying on others who apparently are also as ignorant as she had made her self look?

One would think in a case that has been mishandled from the jump would be handled with kid gloves. Making sure that all of the I’s were dotted and all T’s were crossed.

It now appears along with a Mayor who does not seem to know how to handle a situation we now have a Prosecutor who lacks the competence to deal with the situation.

If the case presented in the article below is accurate it seems possible that Ms. Mosby herself might end up in a legal bind for her apparent incompetence in knowing the legalities of this case. Then stepping up to a microphone and misstating them or simply lying about them.

To read further on the latest check out this article.
Freddie Gray Case – Is Prosecution Already Unraveling?

2 Jihadists Meet Allah in Texas

May 5, 2015
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 10:42 AM

Apparently NO MISSION ACCOMPLISHED for these two. So do they still get the 7 virgins?

Megyn Kelly argues the First Amendment rights with Bill O’Reilly.

For those who do not wish to have FREE SPEECH for all … perhaps a move to a dictatorship OUT OF THE USA is a good fit for you.

Marriage is a DEFINITION So Keep it Simple Stupid!

May 4, 2015
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 17:21 PM

0marriage1From the beginning of time marriage has been defined as the union between “A man and A woman”.

It is a simple straight forward definition.
So simple anyone past 5th grade and passing reading comprehension SHOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO GRASP THE REALITY.
It does not say OR MEAN 2 men and 1 woman, 1 men and 3 women, a man and a horse, a man and a man, a woman and a woman ETC.?

So today we have a TINY minority with their panties in a twist (literally) because THEY DO NOT AND NEVER WILL fit the definition. (EMPHASIS ON TINY).

Somehow they have convinced THE REALLY STUPID among us to go along with their PROGRAM.

0marriage2Changing the definition of marriage to include ANYTHING other than a man and a woman is about as stupid as changing the definition of black to include shades of gray until it becomes white.

Not to mention since when does a TINY MINORITY get to change an “age old” definition? And why is it now before the supreme court?

Apparently Justice Antonin Scalia sees humor in the foolishness of this issue.

What will Justice Anthony Kennedy do?
It is likely he will be the deciding vote in a mess that should have been stopped in its tracks long ago.

His past rulings show he stands for equal rights legally for gay unions … but is there a “legal right” for gays to change an “age old” definition?

My guess would be NO.
Should gays have all of the legal protection and RIGHTS as any heterosexual union?
Of course!

As much as the “Human Rights Campaign” (HRC) wants to push, shove, snivel and whine changing the DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE … is not a HUMAN RIGHT PERIOD!

Define the gay union as anything gays deem appropriate.
Marriage is SIMPLY NOT UP FOR GRABS.

Democratic Party Stuck Like Glue With Hillary Clinton

May 3, 2015
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 19:31 PM

0hillaryAfter 8 years of the corrupt and ethically bankrupt Bill/Hillary Clinton Presidency it appears GORILLA GLUE sticks the Democrats with a Hillary/Bill Presidency choice.

One can only imagine the backroom deals the corrupt, moronic leaders of the Democratic party struck with this disgusting couple.

We have now seen how desperate they were to rid the party of any Clinton when they dumped her for Barack Obama.

Now it is time to pay the piper and Hillary has the DOLT Democratic Party leaders right where she wants them.

It is actually laughable to see how the Democratic Party has worked itself into no choice but to get behind her. The more it gets behind her, the more stuck they GET WITH HER.

One would think any self respecting Democrat would by now be tired of the scandals, blatant corruption, and greed of these two.

BUT NO … after-all the public is too stupid to GET IT … RIGHT?

Bob Herbert of the New York Times suggested “The Clintons may or may not be led away in handcuffs someday.”

barack-obamaSo lets recap a bit here. In 2008 the Democrats dump Hillary for Barack Obama an equally irresponsible and unable to grasp consequences choice.

But he is a black first and the public is too stupid to get it right?

That did not work well for them either.

Now what?

So far Elizabeth Warren is keeping her distance from this fray. Bernie Sanders is throwing his hat in the ring?

Yes indeed FREE AMERICA has come a long way babe!

What Republican wild card campaign could undo this Hillary Clinton candidacy like Barack Obama’s wild card campaign did to her candidacy in 2008?

The Democrats worst nightmare is they are stuck with Hillary Clinton, but she might just give them a President Cruz, President Paul or President Rubio.

Clearly the Democratic Party is between a rock and a hard spot … OHH what to do, what to do? … stick with her or take her down?

Meanwhile the media is forced to launch half ass probing attacks on issues such as the email scandal and the Clinton Foundation contributions that, unlike Benghazi, don’t involve Barack Obama … their sacred cow.

Why?
Trying to force her out in time for Warren or someone else to step in of course.

Barack Obama and Bill Clinton killed any ethics that the Democratic Party had left.

So on one side of the isle we have the Democrats who are corrupt to the core.

On the other side of the isle Republicans who are cowards to the core or WORSE JUST AS CORRUPT.

Freddie Gray Snitched for the Cops?

May 1, 2015
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 19:57 PM

Freddie Gray being a snitch for the cops does not mean he should be dead.

It certainly does explain his behavior and that of those who arrested him.

Could this be a case of the “Boy who cried wolf”?
Unfortunate if so.