Update:
I continue to get asked how did we in America arrive at a point where our leaders believed Mao, Castro, Chavez and a whole slue of other dictators were the good guys to be emulated or revered.

Well here is your answer … the indoctrination started a long time ago.

Who is Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov?

in 1939 in Moscow. The son of a high ranking military officer.
Because of this he was schooled with the elite and became an expert in Indian cultures and Indian languages.

He was a distinguished part of RIA (Russian Information Agency) Novosti the press arm of Soviet Russia. As it turns out it is a front for the KGB.

Mr. Bezmenov escaped from Russian in 1970 because he could not longer condone or live with the tasks he was suppose to carry out.

I would hope all of you would invest your time in listening to this interview. It is about 1 hour 20 minutes in length.

Mr. Bezmenov said the part of the plan was to use the “useful idiots” like Edward Kennedy. He shows pictures and explains how this was done.

The USSR showed great interest in Maharishi Mahesh Yogi because they felt he had the ability to BRAINWASH the mass.

The KGB program did not bother with political leftists (considering them prostitutes and idiots) but to aim higher for the educators and intellectuals (who were considered USEFUL IDIOTS).

The KGB employs a slow process of “ideological subversion”, “active measures” or “psychological warfare” in order to change the perception of reality. It is a very slow brainwashing process. Under the Marxist/Leninist rule people like “Daniel Ellsworth and Jane Fonda would be squashed like cockroaches”.

How long does it take to implememt this process?

1. DEMORALIZATION (15 to 20 years)
2. DESTABILIZATION (2 to 5 years)
3. CRISIS (6 mos)
4. NORMALIZATION where the mass is essentially slave forever how long.

According to Bezmenov the USA was already STUCK in Demoralization the step 1 of the 4 prongs. (be reminded Bezmenov died in 1997)

The USA IS THE LAST BASTION OF FREEDOM. Folks we have nowhere else to go so best WE ALL stand and fight for the survival of our great system.

We the people have been shoved into a corner by our corrupt government. They have REFUSED to listen to the people. They have mocked our “peaceful teaparties”.

What is the next step of action to reclaim our country and Constitution? It does not take rocket science to put a 2 and 2 together where all of this is headed.

While the government is positioned with ass in air and head firmly stuck in the sand … Americans have been arming themselves. This Sheriff is right the straw that breaks the camels back would be the suggestion of further gun control.

Those of us who are true patriots can thank Barack Obama for one thing.
Making us stop, open our eyes, realize and face the fact THE ENEMY has infiltrated our government.

Other videos from Sheriff Mack …

I have always figured when Obama took a tumble it would be because his own party one day woke up screaming WHOA NELLY.

They got on a horse with its reigns detatched and they had no clue where they were about to end up.

Well thanks to Glenn Beck and the TeaParty public finally the protests are beginning to be heard.

Yesterday Byron York Chief Political Correspondent at washingtonexaminer.com wrote this:
Lefty anger splits Dems — and may sink them

“Harry Reid abdicates his leadership role,” reads the headline at the lefty Daily Kos Web site. “Why Joe Biden should resign,” reads the headline at the Huffington Post. “Whiner in Chief,” reads the headline at The Nation, referring to President Obama.

Self-styled progressives across the country are angry, not just at Obama, but at the rest of the Democratic power structure, as well. That anger is causing an ugly split inside the Washington Democratic world.

“Can I speak freely about the liberal whiners?” asks a well-connected Democratic strategist. “These are the same people who have never participated in, much less won, a campaign, who have no idea what it takes to maintain a majority and keep a speaker of our party, who want Obama to kowtow to the loony Left, and then they’re going to be the ones who say, ‘What happened?’ in November 2010, when we lose the House and possibly the Senate and maybe a lot of governorships.”

Whole Article …

Today I ran into what I found to be a very interesting post on Politics. It was originally published in Playboy, March 1969, this article was made available for the web by David Schatz and François-René Rideau. Today you can find it at Mises Daily.

This is not a time of radical, revolutionary politics. Not yet. Unrest, riot, dissent, and chaos notwithstanding, today’s politics is reactionary. Both Left and Right are reactionary and authoritarian. That is to say, both are political. They seek only to revise current methods of acquiring and wielding political power. Radical and revolutionary movements seek not to revise but to revoke. The target of revocation should be obvious. The target is politics itself.
Radicals and revolutionaries have had their sights trained on politics for some time. As governments fail around the world, as more millions become aware that government never has and never can humanely and effectively manage men’s affairs, government’s own inadequacy will emerge, at last, as the basis for a truly radical and revolutionary movement. In the meantime, the radical-revolutionary position is a lonely one. It is feared and hated, by both Right and Left — although both Right and Left must borrow from it to survive. The radical-revolutionary position is libertarianism, and its socioeconomic form is laissez-faire capitalism.

Libertarianism is the view that each man is the absolute owner of his life, to use and dispose of as he sees fit: that all man’s social actions should be voluntary: and that respect for every other man’s similar and equal ownership of life and, by extension, the property and fruits of that life is the ethical basis of a humane and open society. In this view, the only — repeat, only — function of law or government is to provide the sort of self-defense against violence that an individual, if he were powerful enough, would provide for himself.

If it were not for the fact that libertarianism freely concedes the right of men voluntarily to form communities or governments on the same ethical basis, libertarianism could be called anarchy.

Laissez-faire capitalism, or anarchocapitalism, is simply the economic form of the libertarian ethic. Laissez-faire capitalism encompasses the notion that men should exchange goods and services, without regulation, solely on the basis of value for value. It recognizes charity and communal enterprises as voluntary versions of this same ethic. Such a system would be straight barter, except for the widely felt need for a division of labor in which men, voluntarily, accept value tokens such as cash and credit. Economically, this system is anarchy, and proudly so.

Libertarianism is rejected by the modern Left — which preaches individualism but practices collectivism. Capitalism is rejected by the modern Right — which preaches enterprise but practices protectionism. The libertarian faith in the mind of men is rejected by religionists who have faith only in the sins of man. The libertarian insistence that men be free to spin cables of steel, as well as dreams of smoke, is rejected by hippies who adore nature but spurn creation. The libertarian insistence that each man is a sovereign land of liberty, with his primary allegiance to himself, is rejected by patriots who sing of freedom but also shout of banners and boundaries. There is no operating movement in the world today that is based upon a libertarian philosophy. If there were, it would be in the anomalous position of using political power to abolish political power.

The whole story …