You are currently browsing the USA-wethepeople.com weblog archives for the day Monday, December 7th, 2009.

This Month

December 2009
SMTWTFS
« Nov Jan »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Popular Posts

  • Is Obama a Homosexual?: The latest misdirection is that Obama is having an affa... 28 comment(s) | 5367 view(s) | by Economics9698 | posted on 05/06/2010
  • Mitt Romney IS NOT a natu…: For those of you who visit the blog on a regular basis ... 38 comment(s) | 2440 view(s) | by clinicalthinker | posted on 01/03/2012
  • Mitt Romney, Barack Obama…: UPDATE on Mitt Romney “natural born citizen” state. Pl... 29 comment(s) | 1713 view(s) | by clinicalthinker | posted on 10/13/2011
  • 4 Supreme Court Cases def…: I spend a good deal of time in political forums when I ... 22 comment(s) | 1640 view(s) | by clinicalthinker | posted on 04/24/2010
  • Y = C + I + G + NX and th…: Y = C + I + G + NX and the GDP Bull Crap Numbers... 1 comment(s) | 1471 view(s) | by Economics9698 | posted on 02/12/2011








Archive for December 7th, 2009


ZoNation, Telling it like it really is on Obama’s speech.

December 7, 2009
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 9:41 AM

Love this guy

(2comments)

Desiree Rogers needs executive priviledge against sobpoena to testify?

December 7, 2009
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 9:09 AM

desiree rogersExecutive privilege is usually reserved for issues of national security. Can we assume the President considers White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers in need of such?
Apparently so … since Obama was forced to envoke that priviledge to spare her from testifying.
What is the big secret Mr. President?

When Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss) needed to investigate the gate crashing at the White House during the recent state dinner for India, Rodgers was subpoenaed to testify.
A slap in the face from his own party perhaps?
This could not be achieved with a simple request?

My my a liberal Democratic committee chairman embarrasses a liberal Democratic president by forcing a liberal Democratic Social Secretary (from Chicago no less) to resist a subpoena to appear at a hearing?

What next?

(0comments)