Archive for January, 2010
The Tea Party movement came onto the national scene a little over a year ago about the same time as Glen Beck made his television debuted on Fox. In that short time both have raised from cult figures to national forces to be reckoned with. Beck has provided the public with much needed information that is easy to understand about the fascist nature of both the Democrats and Republicans. 41% of voters believe the two major parties are so close in philosophy that a third party is needed. With the grass roots organization by the Tea Party and the defeat of Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts senatorial run off the Tea Party is about to receive a lot of unwanted attention from the two major political parties.

Martha Coakley a better looking Janet Reno
The first will come from the left. With Coakley’s defeat the Democrats are going to come after the Tea Party with all they have. They will use overt tactics like New York Times columnist Frank Rich questioning the motives of the Tea Party calling them a “profit seeking affair” for charging $560 a head at their Nashville Tea Party Convention February 4th to the 6th. He demonizes the Tea Party for having the audacity to use the affair to raise money for their organization. Where was this tool when Obama was charging $28,500 per plate at the Beverly Hills Wilshire Hotel? The Tea Party needs to ignore the tools on the left and open the books for all to see. End of story.
The second attack will possibly be penetration and sabotage. The Palm Beach Post reports Orlando Attorney and Democrat Fred O’Neil recently changed his party affiliation to Tea Party and will field Tea Party candidates in selected congressional races. O’Neil states “We want to get one — but only one — conservative candidate on the ballot in November” in each race. “Sometimes the candidate that the Republicans put up is not a true conservative.” But many are questioning his motives suggesting he will be trying to split the conservative vote in Democratic congressional districts between a Tea Party candidate and the Republican. This would create safe districts for Democrats and foil any upset bids. Palm Beach Post staff writer Tim Dunkin argues that the Tea Party is better off taking over the Republican Party and not forming as a third party.

Florida Republican Senate candidate Marco Rubio
Fred O’Neil has also allegedly sent e-mails to smaller Tea Party groups threatening legal action against them if they continue using the name. Who appointed Fred O’Neil the protector of the Tea Party name? Nobody I know of. Sounds like political sabotage to me.
The third avenue of attack will be from the Republican Party. Republican candidates will use the Tea Party movement to advance their political careers. Two politicians come to mind. The first is Palin. She will be the key note speaker in Nashville. She is on the record on the Glen Beck show as having stated she will not charge for the event. What is her motivation? She declined a chance to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference or CPAC. To me it’s pretty obvious. She is sending a strong message to the Republican establishment that she may run as a Tea Party candidate in 2012. Flashback to 1992 with Bill Clinton winning with 43% of the vote and Ross Perot 19% of the vote. If Palin runs as a Tea Party candidate she will get that 41% of the vote and then some. The Republican Party will be the third man on the outside looking in. Anyone who thinks this lady is dumb is delusional, a tool or dense.

Incumbent Florida Governor Charlie Crist and Republican Senate Candidate
The second candidate to use the Tea Party as a vehicle to rise to stardom is Marco Rubio. At 38 he is challenging incumbent Florida Governor Charlie Crist for the Republican nomination to the US Senate seat formerly held by Mel Martinez. In normal times before the Tea Party this would be a casual affair where the young upstart is gently put in his place come Election Day by the political establishment. But these are not normal times and the electorate is hyper aware of Crist’s record as a RINO.
The most recently supporting a high speed rail line to nowhere known to us locals as Poinciana south of Kissimmee. I can just see all those retirees and cowboys paying that $5 to go to the big city of Sanford. It was a pure pork project designed to get $2 billion in federal funds with no thought of where the line would have been utilized to its fullest advantage. With a little planning and political heat the line could have connected Orlando International Airport to Disney, Sea World and Universal Studios. It would at least stimulate the tourist industry. As it is it will cost federal and Florida taxpayers billions and utilization by the public will be limited. The death blow to Crist and his senatorial campaign and the rise of the Tea Party favorite Marco Rubio. Without the Tea Party this revolt would not have been possible.
Rubio’s motives may or may not be pure. But who is to say a young candidate like Rubio comes on the scene and just replaces an older candidate with a more established track record? The grass roots Republican Party using the Tea Party to clear a little dead wood and get a better candidate with a better chance of winning in position? Rubio is of Cuban decent and speaks fluent Spanish. Republicans need all the Hispanics they can get. Looks like it already happened. I would be dismayed and shocked if Crist wins this primary.
The point being is that the Tea Party can be a long term force or a flash in the pan. It will get attacked and used from all sides. Democrats, Republicans and the press. Welcome to the big show. The Tea Party needs to get more centralized at the national level to organize what its goals are. The main goal of the Tea Party should be to become independent of the Republican and Democrat Party. It should work with both parties when it is in their interest but keep a safe distance.
What the Tea Party leadership needs to remember is that 44% of conservatives ARE NOT Republicans for a reason. For me personally as a Libertarian I disagree with Republicans holier than though attitude about abortion. Abortion should be decided at the local level by the local people. I disagree with their attitude about gambling, prostitution, spending, social security, Medicaid, education and every other federal program they and the Democrats have inflicted on this land. Let the locals set up the types of communities they want and go away with your bible thumping patriots. Live free or die.
A lot of Democrats dislike their party just as intensely as I do Republicans. They hate the hijacking of their party by the radicals. They hate the deficit spending. They may be compassionate and want to help others but would rather do it at the local level where they can have direct access to the politicians spending the money. Maybe they support the Tea Party because they see no alternative to bringing back the Democratic Party to its roots before Woodrow Wilson when they truly were the party of the people. If the Tea Party becomes the lap dog of the Republican Party they can kiss any Democrat support goodbye.
What conservatives and liberals need to realize is both parties were hijacked by progressives at the turn of the 20th century. Teddy Roosevelt (R) and Woodrow Wilson (D) changed the parties into what they are today. There is not a dimes worth of difference between them and both are dedicated to dictatorship over the masses.

Scott Brown upset the establishment in Massachusetts
Traditionally in the past liberals would oppose the police state, militarization of society and imperialism. Their party has been taken over and now Obama is working with large corporations to conquer the world and eliminate competition. Monopolies and oligopolies for all. GE, GM, Goldman Sacks, Citi Bank to name a few of Obama’s favorites. Obama also wants to create a domestic police force just as large as the military. For what? We all know what and so do thinking liberals. And where do these liberals have to turn? Not their party. They are in the same predicament Republicans were with Bush spending like a drunken sailor on leave. If the Tea Party gets to close to the Republican Party this support will be gone and that segment of the Democratic Party will once again be in the political wilderness.
The correct course for the Tea Party would be to stick to its principals of limited government as outlined in the constitution of the United States and the elimination of the Federal Reserve as it is currently configured. Ignore wedge issues designed by politicians to create brain lock in the electorate like Global Warming and abortion. Ignore all other political distractions and concentrate on the core mission of returning the nation to the constitution and federalism. It’s that simple.
Field candidates as needed. There is no need to apologize for taking Republican votes. Republicans don’t own those votes and if they lose a few elections then so be it. Republicans got where they are because they have no principals. Let them suffer. Sooner or later if they don’t shape up the Tea Party will replace them. This argument that the Democrats will win every election if the Tea Party runs a candidate is absurd if the Tea Party appeals to the natural instincts of liberals to avoid a police state. All the Tea Party has to do is effectively communicate that message to liberals. Sooner or later liberals will wake up and see how their party has been over run with fascist that are taking them for a ride to the gulag.
What would I do if the Libertarians suddenly got 41% of the population supporting them? I would kick a little ass. Both parties deserve it and I would show no mercy. Raise money and field candidates. If the Republicans want to work together fine do it on equal terms. Same with the Democrats. Don’t be anybody’s bitch and kick some ass.
Everyone is interested in who grabs the Senate seat that once belonged to the late Teddy Kennedy.
Will it be Coakley or Brown?
Whatever happens it should be a wake up call for the Dems. … at how totally ticked off the mass is over their outrageous tactics and full bore corruption in their party.
Personally I will not hold my breath for their enlightenment.
Whatever success Brown has … the equally clueless NRSC (National Republican Senatorial Committee) would like to take credit. Their paltry donations are laughable.
In truth this was an uprising by the people, and a movement that will continue all across this country. THE PEOPLE can and will do this without the permission of Washington GOP elites.
This is really no big shock.
It is however indicative mentality of so many today. I have to wonder how long it will take to come back to an ethical base being the status quo rather than the lie, cheat, and screw your own grandmother mode of operation that seems so prevalent today.
Apparently MSNBC television and syndicated radio host Ed Schultz does not care that now the whole world knows his true character.
What an embarassment to this great United States and all that it has endured to enable us all to have a FREE HONEST VOTE.
Who on earth wastes their time listening to this piece of “pond scum” for long?
His sponsors should all die of SHAME.
There is a lot of common sense information in this e-mail that points to the reactionary nature of government. This applies to security but also economics, health care, transportation and all aspects of bureaucracy. It is the age old dilemma of the “military fighting the last war” that applies to all aspects of government and why Libertarians support privatizing and no regulating most aspects of society. Government more often than not gets in the way of progress. Once in a while government does something right but for the most part if it’s politicized it lame and wasteful or in extreme circumstances deadly.
Juval Aviv was the Israeli Agent upon whom the movie ‘Munich’ was based. He was Golda Meir’s bodyguard, and she appointed him to track down and bring to justice the Palestinian terrorists who took the Israeli athletes hostage and killed them during the Munich Olympic Games.
In a lecture in New York City he shared information that EVERY American needs to know — but that our government has not yet shared with us.

Juval Aviv gives common sense advice on terrorism
He predicted the London subway bombing on the Bill O’Reilly show on Fox News stating publicly that it would happen within a week. At the time, O’Reilly laughed, and mocked him saying that in a week he wanted him back on the show. Unfortunately, within a week the terrorist attack had occurred.
Juval Aviv gave intelligence (via what he had gathered in Israel and the Middle East) to the Bush Administration about 9/11, a month before it occurred. His report specifically said they would use planes as bombs and target high profile buildings and monuments. Congress has since hired him as a security consultant.
Now for his future predictions. He predicts the next terrorist attack on the U.S. will occur within the next few months.
Forget hijacking airplanes, because he says terrorists will NEVER try and hijack a plane again as they know the people onboard will never go down quietly again. Aviv believes our airport security is a joke — that we have been reactionary rather than proactive in developing strategies that are truly effective.
For example:
1) Our airport technology is outdated. We look for metal, and the new explosives are made of plastic.
2) He talked about how some idiot tried to light his shoe on fire. Because of that, now everyone has to take off their shoes. A group of idiots tried to bring aboard liquid explosives. Now we can’t bring liquids on board. He says he’s waiting for some suicidal maniac to pour liquid explosive on his underwear; at which point, security will have us all traveling naked!
Every strategy we have is reactionary.
3) We only focus on security when people are heading to the gates.
Aviv says that if a terrorist attack targets airports in the future, they will target busy times on the front end of the airport when/where people are checking in. It would be easy for someone to take two suitcases of explosives, walk up to a busy check-in line, ask a person next to them to watch their bags for a minute while they run to the restroom or get a drink, and then detonate the bags BEFORE security even gets involved. In Israel, security checks bags BEFORE people can even ENTER the airport.
Aviv says the next terrorist attack here in America is imminent and will involve suicide bombers and non-suicide bombers in places where large groups of people congregate. (i.e., Disneyland, Las Vegas casinos, big cities (New York, San Francisco, Chicago, etc.) and that it will also include shopping malls, subways in rush hour, train stations, etc., as well as, rural America this time. The interlands (Wyoming, Montana, etc.).
The attack will be characterized by simultaneous detonations around the country (terrorists like big impact), involving at least 5-8 cities, including rural areas.
Aviv says terrorists won’t need to use suicide bombers in many of the larger cities, because at places like the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, they can simply valet park a car loaded with explosives and walk away.
Aviv says all of the above is well known in intelligence circles, but that our U. S. Government does not want to ‘alarm American citizens’ with the facts. The world is quickly going to become ‘a different place’, and issues like ‘global warming’ and political correctness will become totally irrelevant.
On an encouraging note, he says that Americans don’t have to be concerned about being nuked. Aviv says the terrorists who want to destroy America will not use sophisticated weapons. They like to use suicide as a front-line approach. It’s cheap, it’s easy, it’s effective; and they have an infinite abundance of young militants more than willing to ‘meet their destiny’.
He also says the next level of terrorists, over which America should be most concerned, will not be coming from abroad. But will be, instead, ‘homegrown’, having attended and been educated in our own schools and universities right here in the U.S. He says to look for ‘students’ who frequently travel back and forth to the Middle East. These young terrorists will be most dangerous because they will know our language and will fully understand the habits of Americans; but that we Americans won’t know/understand a thing about them.
Aviv says that, as a people, Americans are unaware and uneducated about the terrorist threats we will inevitably face. America still has only a handful of Arabic and Farsi speaking people in our intelligence networks, and Aviv says it is critical that we change that fact SOON.
So, what can America do to protect itself? From an intelligence perspective, Aviv says the U.S. needs to stop relying on satellites and technology for intelligence. We need to, instead, follow Israel’s, Ireland’s and England’s hands-on examples of human intelligence, both from an infiltration perspective as well as to pay attention to, and trust ‘aware’ citizens to help. We need to engage and educate ourselves as citizens; however, our U. S. government continues to treat us, its citizens, ‘like babies’. Our government thinks we ‘can’t handle the truth’ and are concerned that we’ll panic if we understand the realities of terrorism. Aviv says this is a deadly mistake.
Aviv recently created/executed a security test for our Congress, by placing an empty briefcase in five well-traveled spots in five major cities. The results? Not one person called 911 or sought a policeman to check it out. In fact, in Chicago, someone tried to steal the briefcase!
In comparison, Aviv says that citizens of Israel are so well ‘trained’ that an unattended bag or package would be reported in seconds by citizen(s) who know to publicly shout, ‘Unattended Bag!’ The area would be quickly & calmly cleared by the citizens themselves.
Unfortunately, America hasn’t been yet ‘hurt enough’ by terrorism for their government to fully understand the need to educate its citizens or for the government to understand that it’s their citizens who are, inevitably, the best first-line of defense against terrorism.
Aviv also was concerned about the high number of children here in America who were in preschool and kindergarten after 9/11, who were ‘lost’ without parents being able to pick them up, and about our schools that had no plan in place to best care for the students until parents could get there. (In New York City, this was days, in some cases!)
He stresses the importance of having a plan, that’s agreed upon within your family, of how to respond in the event of a terrorist emergency. He urges parents to contact their children’s schools and demand that the schools too, develop plans of actions, just as they do in Israel.
Does your family know what to do if you can’t contact one another by phone? Where would you gather in an emergency? He says we should all have a plan that is easy enough for even our youngest children to remember and follow.
Aviv says that the U. S. government has in force a plan, that in the event of another terrorist
attack, EVERYONE’s ability to use cell phones, blackberries, etc., will immediately be cut-off, as this is the preferred communication source used by terrorists and is often the way that their bombs are detonated.
How will you communicate with your loved ones in the event you cannot speak to each other? You need to have a plan.
If you understand, and believe what you have just read, then you must feel compelled to send this to every concerned parent, guardian, grandparents, uncles, aunts, whomever. Don’t stop there. In addition to sharing this via e-mail, contact and discuss this information with whomever it makes sense to. Make contingency plans with those you care about. Better that you have plans in place, and never have to use them, then to have no plans in place, and find you needed them.
If you choose not to share this, or not to have a plan in place, and nothing ever occurs — good for you! However, in the event something does happen, and even moreso, if it directly affects your loved ones, then this e-mail will haunt you forever.
Telling yourself after the fact, “I should have sent this to so and so, but deleted it as so much trash from old Bill Jones, plus, I just didn’t believe it”, will not change anything. You were alerted, had the chance to do something, and instead of erring on the side of caution, you chose to disregard, if nothing else, a sensible, valuable warning.
My 2 cents on the comments on http://usa-wethepeople.com/2010/01/random-thoughts-on-palin-beck-and-obama/#comments
I watched all of the recent Palin interviews. I am sorry to say it appears she is getting a little conditioned to media attack.
Her main strength is who she is … people tune in on that. They do not care if she winks, hugs or says “you betcha”.
Those trying to polish her up and mold her into a politician are DEAD WRONG. Let her remain a diamond in the rough … give her her head … she is like a fine racehorse that instinctively KNOWS HOW TO WIN AND HAS THE HEART FOR IT.
Those who think she is stupid are TRULY THE STUPID ONES.
When you hear someone call her stupid respond with a “YOU ARE THE STUPID ONE!”
A spade is a spade and we are all watching our USA tank because of the politically correct whining hacks and those who choose to learn from them.
What Sarah Palin understands is LIFE IS HARD … no one promised easy here so you better buck up little buddies if you are going to survive to thrive. How many of us forgot that in the raising of our kids? Personally from day one I understood Dr. Spock was a wingnut and his advice for bringing up kids was in left field. I tossed his book for fools ONLY.
So we have a generation or 2 primed for the government taking care of them and thinking its great. What they do not all quite realize is THEY GET TO PAY?
As for Beck … when you have hit bottom there is literally no place but lateral or up. Beck had the metal to choose up and the key? To daily be grateful for the experience, knowledge, and understanding to change.
How many of us can say the same?
I have few words for Obama.
He knows exactly what he is doing and it is intended.
He is a narcissist and anyone with that malady is nothing at all under that facade. I am not sure who made him … what I am sure of is sooner or later we will all find out.
Last let me say this to those willing to use the RACE CARD BULLSHIT:
IF BARACK OBAMA WERE WHITE HE WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ELECTED!
I don’t know why I watched this show this past Saturday (1-16-10) when Sigourney Weaver was host. Boredom. Nothing else on. Nostalgia. Maybe all three. But it was the most disappointing television I have seen in decades. In fact it has been decades since I watched it other than clips on the internet usually about Palin or the housing bubble scams. So it’s been awhile.

Sigourney Weaver host 1-16-10
Rock bottom. Stupid. Inappropriate. Bumbling. A complete waste of time. How can these people even think they are some kind of trend setters or hip, cool, with it, groovy? Those days have come and gone. I feel bad for anyone who is the butt of their jokes that has to watch it. What god awful pain it is to endure.
An example of how low they have gotten would be the skit with Kenan Thompson playing a 50 year old selling a video of himself and some 50ish European hooker past her prime doing sexual position like the “lawnmower”. The euro trash holds Kenan’s ankles in the air while he lifts himself up off the floor with his hands as he is lying down on his blubbery belly. She moves him back and forth around the room as the tub of lard humps at the floor pretending to be a lawnmower cutting the grass with his penis? I didn’t get it and it wasn’t funny just gross and awkward.
Sigourney Weaver running around with a stuffed animal shooting flames at “lazar” cats? This passes for comedy in NYC? Pathetic waste of time.
The news segment takes pokes at Palin telling us for the millionth time she is dumb and the scrip writer at Fox will have to abbreviate her teleprompter scrip. Do these fools really think they are intellectually superior to Palin or anyone for that matter? Freaking get real dues and dudets. These people are living in some alternative universe. They need to sit down and watch their show sometime. Hell the audience didn’t even laugh and they really wanted to.
Glen Beck and Sarah Palin offered to co-host the show. If Glen and Sarah are smart they will write the whole show. Guaranteed to be 100 times better than the moronic 4th grade skits that are on there now.
I was watching the Beck interview with Palin on 1-13-10 on Fox and the thoughts just ran wild. The first thought is Glen looked like a 6th grader eying the hot teacher trying his best to impress her that he really is a grown up. Palin to her credit is a wonderful actress but I couldn’t help but notice a little “stay away from me creep” in her body language. Most of us have experienced someone taking a unwelcome interest in us, usually of the sexual nature, and just wanting to get as far away as fast as possible. Maybe I am wrong but when Glen starting saying he wanted another George Washington to appear and save the country staring at Sarah with his almost crying eyes it was just freaking awkward. I felt Sarah just wanted to reach over and smack the little kid saying “that’s not appropriate now behave yourself”. But this is television and that will never happen.

Glen Beck
For the record Mr. Beck Sarah is no George Washington. She is no Abraham Lincoln. She most closely resembles in personality and background Andrew Jackson (1829 to 1837). She grew up in the wilderness and has a common realistic view of the world and how to solve problems. She has run businesses for survival not photo ops on Fortune Magazine. She worked her way through college and struggled, sacrificed and had very little preferential treatment other than that afforded her by her beautiful looks and natural grace. I would classify her as a tough red neck chic who got the hog wash knocked out of her pretty early in life. She has had pretty much the same life story as Andrew Jackson except different sexes.
Andrew Jackson was extremely passionate about doing what was best for the average person. He didn’t talk the talk like today’s liberals and then as soon as he was elected plunder the treasury rewarding his friends. Jackson walked the walk. Like Palin today Jackson’s opponents slandered and distorted his record and dug up every bit of dirt on him they could. He didn’t care except when it came to his family and did everything in his power to help the average man and keep the federal government under control.
Jackson did what so many are calling for today, he ended the Federal Reserve. Back then it was the Second Bank of the United States. The Federal Reserve of it’s time. And as is today Jackson’s opponent at the Second Bank, Chairman Nicholas Biddle waged a war against Jackson. The usual political dirt was dragged up as well as arguments for the continuation of the charter for the Second Bank. Jackson argued that the second bank concentrated the nation’s financial strength in a single institution, exposed the government to control by foreign interests, served mainly to make the rich richer, exercised too much control over members of Congress and favored northeastern states over southern and western states.

Andrew Jackson 1829 to 1837
Does any of this sound familiar? According to the federal government four banks own 56% of the market share in the United States. They are too big to fail so we the people just gave them $700 billion of our money. If we had never bailed them out the market share would be spread out over hundreds of smaller banks. But in stepped the Federal Reserve and Treasury Secretary Paulson to save them. And wouldn’t you just know it the Federal reserve reported a 52.1 billion dollar profit for 2009! It’s just amazing how much money you can make when you can add zeros to accounts and print your own money! Who cares about the people and inflation? The big guys made money. Palin hasn’t stated a position on this subject but I suspect she would favor ending the Federal Reserve.
Jackson and Palin don’t have a once of ego between the two of them. Both know life’s hardships. Both know the power of Mother Nature as well as the higher being. Neither Jackson nor Palin would never look down on anyone and think they are superior in any way. No better or worse just blessed by god to be in a position to make peoples lives better. Humble but ready to fight for what is right.
This is quite the contrast to our ethnocentric president. All you have to do is look at the upbringing of Obama to see why he is a continuation of Bush and the plundering of the American Treasury. Divorce mother, abandoned at the age of ten, raised by grandparents who sent him to a private school. Never had to have a crappy teenage job. Never had to work his way through college. Never had to get the SAT or LAST scores to get into the finest universities. He learned early that work is for losers and never bothered. A scholarship from PLO spokesman. Affirmative action selection for Colombia and Harvard. He got the affirmative action ride of a lifetime.
Look at his actions. Health care reform that creates insurance oligopolies that will raise rates and tax the poor, special deals with upper middle class union members, pork projects that benefit his contributors, sympathy for Haiti while ignoring American terrorist victims for three days, contempt for his campaign promises of openness. He is an elitist in every sense of the word. The closest person I would compare him to would be King Lois the XVI of France and Marie Antoinette. Partying and living the high life while the peasants starved in the streets of Paris. “Let them eat cake” is now “Let them have health care”. Barack and Michele living the high life in Washington while the country slips into a depression from his excessive spending and financial favors to his constituents. He is a horrible example of a human being that is well on his way to being despised as much as King Louis was in his day.

Sarah Palin
Finally I just get sick and tired of Sarah Palin being called dumb and Obama smart. Obama is an affirmative action hack. Nothing more and nothing less. Palin I would guess has an IQ around 100. Obama I would guess around 95. Just a guess. Neither one is a brain surgeon. Neither one will be bragging about their SAT scores anytime soon. The difference between the two is one knows who she is and one doesn’t have an ounce of common sense. One faced the harsh realities of life on her own and one was given a ride through life. One has worked hard for a meager wage and one despises work and feels only losers’ work for a living. Sarah is the next Andrew Jackson and Obama is our living breathing King Louis the XVI spending the public treasury on his friends and himself.
My brother sent this link to me and I took the time to watch.
It certainly tossed me back into a time where PATRIOTIC was instilled in every child.
The story of February and a great pilot named Jim Brooks.
Sarah Palin has agreed to be a contributor to Fox News. She made her first interview with Mr. Bill on 1-12-10. To Mr. O’Reilly’s credit he hit her hard with some tough criticisms and questions. Complain all you want about Mr. Bill, and I have on a few occasions, when it comes to political interviews he is up there with the late great Tim Russert. Tough, fair and direct. Now for the Palin criticisms.

Sarah Palin
First thing that disappointed me about Sarah was her posture. She was leaning forward towards Bill when she should have been sitting strait up in her chair just like Bill. Hopefully she will learn this at Fox. When she leans forward she reminds me of my ex-wife who was a triple D bra size. Now for most men this is GREAT! But to my ex it was an embarrassment and she often hid what Mother Nature endowed her with. She wore multiple garments and slouched over like Sarah did. All the years I was married to her I just scratched my head and wondered why? Guys love the happy sacks so why hide them? Sit back in the chair and let the world see Mother Nature at work. If the camera guy wants to focus on them then so be it. Never be ashamed of your body for better or worse. Of course you don’t want to flaunt them like a cheap whore but don’t hide them. Guys will really appreciate you just being real. Sarah needs to take the attitude “this is who I am” and that’s it. Trust me the guy vote will increase 5%.
Second Bill played a clip from other news outlets criticizing her lack of knowledge in the area of foreign policy. Specifically the Korean peninsula. She answered the question but did she know the Korean War was from 1950 to 1953? Guys know this. We take an interest in it because we are the ones fighting and dying in these wars. Would it be demeaning to say that the communist north invaded the capitalist south in 1950 and later the communist Chinese with USSR MIG-15 assistance continued the conflict until the cease fire in 1953? Come on Sarah let us know you know about Korea, Vietnam, WWII, WWI, The Spanish American war of 1898 that Teddy Roosevelt participated in, the South and Central American adventures in overthrowing banana republics and the rest. Get that education and history level up to par in the coming years. If Sarah doesn’t study it will catch up to her sooner or later.
Third I am all for this lady. Unlike Huckabee who is a fake conservative in my opinion she is the real deal. Her role in history will be historic. If the Republicans behave badly after their 2010 blowouts in the midterm elections, very likely considering their past record of corruption, she is the lone person that can drive a dagger through the heart of the Republican Party. If she uses her charisma and abilities to organize a Tea Party to challenge Republicans and Democrats in 2012 it’s a game changer. It would be historic and for the first time in a hundred years give power back to the people. She would be the beginning of the end of the political oligopoly that has strangled America for 165 years.
In Sarah’s defense she is just a regular red neck girl, or whatever they call them in Alaska, who never in her wildest dreams thought she would be trust into the spotlight. She has fabulous instincts and I would guess have outstanding appointments to her cabinet if she was elected. Who knows maybe she would break up the Ivy League graduate appointments that have run this country into the ground. One can only hope. She just needs to get the body language, media tricks and her performance from a “B” to an “A”. If she does that she a winner no matter which party she runs as a candidate in 2012. Her charisma is off the charts! All that is left is the boring homework and polishing. Go Sarah and bring the country back to the people.
The Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has had an old quote come back to haunt him. He described Obama as a “light skinned” African-American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one” – and that it would help rather than hurt his eventual presidential bid. What a complete crock of dung this whole story is.
First this is an old story. It was out there in 2008 for anyone reading anything other than the main stream media. We have the internet now and if anyone is surprised by this story they are only fooling themselves. Please let’s pass on the propaganda and get to the real story.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
The real story is Reid is toast in Nevada. Reid passed health care with 60 votes and his job is done. He is expendable. With the loss of the 60th senate vote looming on the horizon with a possible Republican elected in Massachusetts or the death of Robert “KKK” Bird expected any day now there is really no reason to keep the highly unpopular Reid around agitating voters with his diminutive smug stature. That is why this old story was dragged out of the mud.
Second the Democrats want to drag out the race card in 2010 so they have to clean house of the Klan members and put the other democrats on notice to tone down the bigoted remarks made towards their slaves at the bottom of the food chain. The party of Jim Crow and George Wallace needs to come off as the party of Negros in 2010 or they will lose by huge margins. It’s all about stirring up the Negros for the mid term elections.
The Democrats would like to replace Reid and Pelosi for the 2010 election but especially Reid since his prospects of reelection are slim to none. Like Daschle before him he is universally hated and despised by the people. Time for another front man. Maybe an affirmative action female like Janet Napolitano or Sonia Sotomayor. Maybe another Negro that Obama can relate to like Charles Wrangle. Dumb and dumber with or without pigment. Who cares? Baffle the peasants with bull crap. Get the Negros riled up enough to get their 80% fat asses to the polls on Election Day. This is so transparent it’s funny. Got to get the dumb asses to the polls or we will lose congress. Play the race card.
One final thought. When I was growing up and I am certain when Reid was growing up the common term for blacks was Negro. This was the term used by the older generation to confer respect to these people and different from the more common street term nigger. Back then most white men were not scared to call out “niggers” on the street. “Hey nigger tip your hat to that lady son”. Just like that and the Negros of the day would tip that hat or get a beat down or maybe a lynching. So when Reid was using the term “Negro” he was showing respect and may or may not have thought Negros inferior. My guess is after working with Maxine Waters, Roland Burris, Barbra Lee and the other idiots running around congress without a clue he doesn’t have the highest respect for the black race. But that’s just a guess.
