Obama Lawyer (Alexandra M. Hill) Implies Birth Certificate Is A Forgery

April 13, 2012
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 11:54 AM

Purpura and Moran New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection.

Weaving its way through the court system is another eligibility challenge for Barack Obama.

April 10, 2012, Nicholas E. Purpura and Theodore T. Moran had their Barack Obama primary ballot objection heard by Deputy Director and Administrative Law Judge, Jeff S. Masin.

Barack Obama was represented by Alexandra M. Hill of the firm of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi of Newark, New Jersey.

Ms. Hill is the latest newbie to be dragged into the mire of Barack Obama’s eligibility troubles.

Ms. Hill is based in the firm’s Newark, New Jersey office and is a member of the Commercial Real Estate, Redevelopment & Environmental Law and Corporate Political Activity Law Practice Groups.

Ms. Hill received her Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in 2011, achieving Dean’s List 2010-2011. She was a Lead Articles Editor for The Tax Lawyer and active in the Student Bar Association. She earned her Bachelor of Arts in Political Science in 2008 from Emory University.

While in law school, Ms. Hill served as a summer law clerk at Brown & Connery, LLP, extern at the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law (Voting Rights) and Judicial Intern for the United States Court of Federal Claims, Office of Special Masters. From 2003-2008, Ms. Hill served as an intern for the Camden County Democrat Committee.

It looks as though the Obama defenders have put this not yet dry behind the ears youngling against some pretty seasoned legal experts. Not only seasoned lawyers but seasoned constitutional experts.

“Ms. Hill implied that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and and followed with the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.

Ms. Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.

The opposition argued that Mr. Obama under the Constitution has to be a “natural born Citizen.” That under New Jersey law (the state constitution, statutes, and case law), Mr. Obama must show that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents.

I would say Ms. Hill’s ignorance of the Constitution is jaw dropping but we have seen so much of this of late one can become numb to it.

Masin as expected punted the final decision to the Secretary of State Kimberly M. Guadagno.

On 4-12-12 Guadagno issued her Final Decision in Nicholas E. Purpura and Theodore T. Moran v. Barack Obama New Jersey Primary Ballot Objection. A copy of her decision may be read here, http://www.scribd.com/puzo1/d/89431332-Final-Decision-of-SOS-in-Purpura-Moran-Ballot-Objection-4-12-12. She concludes without any explanation: “After full consideration of the record and a review of the exceptions filed, I hereby adopt the ALJ’s Initial Decision in its entirety.”

Other links to this issue:

Update on the Purpura and Moran New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/letter-to-george-miller-from-nj-sos-office

http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/protectourliberty.htm

Tags: , , , , , , ,


6 Responses to “Obama Lawyer (Alexandra M. Hill) Implies Birth Certificate Is A Forgery”

  1. Obama Lawyer (Alexandra M. Hill) Implies Birth Certificate Is A Forgery « bobusnr Says:

    [...] Obama Lawyer (Alexandra M. Hill) Implies Birth Certificate Is A Forgery April 13, 2012 Posted by clinicalthinker @ 11:54 AM [...]

  2. Martin Moore Sr Says:

    THis is beyond absurd – beyond ridiculous that Obama’s personal legal counsel would admit the certificate is a forgery and the press or no media member is interested in letting the public in general know nor does anyone seem to care. Her admission that it was a forgery – as the counsel FOR Obama virtually eliminates any doubt that Obama has not provided any evidence of US Birthrights. To argue that because he is so popular- he needn’t comply with the constitution had to have been at least submitted and likely reviewed by Obama himself. In that light – how on God’s green earth can this man be trusted. I well remember the detailed “story” – apparently fabircated – of all thelong flights to Hawaii to get this certificate. That was all a lie too? My Lord what have some American voters perpetrated on our country. WE need to get him out of office via massive conservative turnout in the 2012 election.

    THis also raises the question of the legality or legitimacy of all the bills, treaties and other representative documents he signed – and executive orders. Would his failure to meet constitutional requirements mandate that any decision he made was also revoked? If so we are in an even bigger mess than before. This man claimed transparency was a goal. He is far and away the most non-transparent – in fact invisible- person ever to serve in that office. And if the forgery was infact as such – based on his knowledge – he may well be the first president to spend time in prison or house arrest. This man and whomever is promoting and supporting this perpetration of fraud needs to be exposed and punished to the fullest extent of the law.

  3. jack knott Says:

    I have been researching his background for more than 4 years, and have accumulated a lot of material. His Mombasa birth certificate, appears to be genuine. I have not made a trip to Kenya, but others have. There seems to be enough evidence and witnesses, including his grandmother that was there, to cause the Congress to pursue an investigation into his unqualified status to run for President. The Hawaiian certificate of live birth is not a birth certificate, and is a forgery, from the beginning.
    I cannot accept the fact that our media did nothing about this birth, except simply say that he is a U.S. Citizen

  4. ClinicalThinker Says:

    Hello Gentlemen,

    I agree.
    It certainly makes everyone who remains silent on these issues either ignorant of the Constitution or corrupt.

    In either case everyone who remains silent need to be remembered and booted when their election date rolls around.

    How can you uphold a document you HAVE SWORN TO UPHOLD if you are ignorant of what is says or means?

  5. PQ Says:

    Technically that’s what a lawyer calls an in-the-alternate argument. I can’t speak to the NJ statutes, but I wouldn’t assume anything, and they are subordinate to the federal statutes on the subject, which I address over at the main article page at http://usa-wethepeople.com/2011/09/having-the-status-of-birthright-citizenship-is-not-sufficient-to-make-one-an-article-ii-%E2%80%9Cnatural-born%E2%80%9D/

    In fairness, if Obama himself took part in the forgery, I could certainly see a case against him, but I doubt a single competent staffer would ever let that happen. You’d also want to know if Mitt was in the loop on any illegal foreign contributions (felony). Well, you could always hope for Ron Paul.

    But that said, if you read what I say carefully, I think I do a competent job of replying to all of Apuzzo’s arguments on that page.

  6. motel6 Says:

    I think this is one of the most important info for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But want to
    remark on few general things, The web site style is great,
    the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers


Leave a Reply



− 1 = 7