Ron Paul claims the military is a big financial supporter of him.

Funny have you heard who appears to be in bed with Mitt Romney?
Clearly Romney has a problem with his image of “BEING AN UBER RICH GUY”.
Personally I do not care if he is the richest guy in the world unless he got that cash illegally which does not appear to be the case at all.

But who is pushing, prodding and funding him AND WHY … is of definite interest.
Looks like if this chart is accurate Mitt Romney is the WALL STREET flavor of the 2012 election scene.
Chart and full story about it HERE.

Now Donald Trump another uber rich guy jumps on the Romney bandwagon?
Don’t get me wrong. I like Trump because he is gutsy, goes relentlessly after what he wants.
But the sudden endorsement of Romney?
Something about all of this sort of raises my Antennae?

Come on everyone start to connect the dots.
WOW does it look like WallStreet is beginning to hedge its bet realizing Obama has skidded into a brick wall?
Is far to battered and bruised to come out of 2012 a winner?
Shucks Batman do ya think?

So who is the next most likely push over left in the race?
ROMNEY? Is that a mirage?

It is clear to anyone with 20/20 vision that Paul or Gingrich do not fit the “PUSH OVER BILL”.

Oh my gosh how much money are Paul and Gingrich getting from WallStreet?
How much did the other NON PUSH OVERS (Bachmann and Cain) get?
PEANUTS? … did I say peanuts? more like chicken scratch according to the above chart.

We have a large segment of society swallowing the “media crap” hook line and sinker “lemming style”.
Why? Because they are to lazy to get off their dead asses and check anything out for themselves.
We have another segment of society swallowing the progressive rhetoric hook line and sinker “lemming style”.
Why? Because they are the true “useful idiots” that the left counts on to survive.

Then we have those of us somewhere in the middle not knowing what the hell to think, do or why.

How does our country survive?
Each of us better start to think for ourselves … use your common sense.
Dig around in the FACTS. Give up the OPINIONS of others.
Form your own opinions.
Take the information you find here or on any other internet source and check it out FOR YOURSELF.

Time the mass gives up being a part of the “flat world” believers and opt for the round world REALITY.

Mitt Romney makes a gaff and finds himself being thrashed by the left.

Newt Gingrich speaks about the disadvantaged poor being stuck in the ghetto mentality of not working and gets thrashed by the left and the right.

What don’t these thick headed opposition dolts get?
Oh wait they do get it their real motive is to keep the disadvantaged in the ghetto and disadvantaged!

For 13 months Eric Holder has been dragging his feet on getting to the bottom of who authorized fast and furious.

Information any COMPETENT person could come up with in days if not hours.

Cover-up, corruption, stupidity or all of the above?

Sean Hannity asks Newt Gingrich what his first actions would be if he were to become President of the United States.

I think it is good to hear from the candidates what they have to say.

You can decide who to support by listening to their own words.

I was stunned as this story started to unfold before my eyes.

For years (about 15) I have registered my domains at GoDaddy after a terrible experience with another company that somehow dropped a domain that belonged to me.
For all of these years I point people to GoDaddy to register their domains.
All of my domains are registered with them.
That number has ranged from 40 to 60 over the years.
I have never lost a domain, it is easy to manage your sites and the customer service has been excellent.

Today I ran into 2 stories that shed a different light on GoDaddy.

First was the Post & Email website seemed to vanish when their coverage of the Georgia citizenship ballot challenge for Barack Obama took place.
I am registered to re post their material if I so choose and have several times in the past.

From what I can piece together apparently that Georgia vs Obama article probably caused an overload on the GoDaddy server and they (GoDaddy) simply shut the site down without notice. That part is not so bad since most servers have a protection built in for hackers trying to blow out a website (or server) for fun or other agenda.

It has happened twice to this blog and was quickly fixed with great tech services on my server.

What happened next to Sharon Rondeau the owner of Post & Email is not what any site owner wants to experience.
You can read her story HERE:

The GoDaddy problem AT THIS POST IS STILL ongoing.

As if that were not bad enough someone posted a video link that points out GoDaddy supported SOPA.
That was a head spinner.
Anyone with how the internet works behind the scenes should be appalled with this bill.
GoDaddy was not until it lost a bunch of its customers with more ready to leave in the future.

That story can be seen in the video below:

The results for me?
A letter to GoDaddy giving them my thoughts on the matters.
No more GoDaddy recommends to clients, friends and people simply asking my opinion.
If they continue along this POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE path?
My own domains will be moved to a different registrar.

Now Matt Drudge is on the “we think Gingrich is not conservative”?
I was aghast the other night when I heard Ann Coulter say Mitt Romney was THE REAL CONSERVATIVE in the Presidential race for 2012.

I simply passed it off as SHE HAS SLIPPED A COG OR 2.
Maybe because SHE IS A CHRISTY GIRL supporting her guy for what?
VP to Mitt by chance?

Now Matt Drudge is falling sway for this lunacy too?
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME?

Between Romney and Gingrich the WHO IS THE MOST CONSERVATIVE PRIZE clearly goes to Newt
FOR YEARS AND YEARS.
Personally I have been voting for 50 years as a Republican and conservative.
To my knowledge Gingrich HAS NEVER BEEN ANYTHING BUT CONSERVATIVE.

All of the Romney RHETORIC about how he was Governor in a Democratic run state so HE WAS FORCED to go along with their will?
Sounds like a total crock to me.
Then add to that the explanations for his apparent changes of mind (aka flip flop)?
Sorry folks that is not bipartisan cooperation or unification it is plain and simple CAVING IN … for whatever reason I don’t know or care.

How far do the excuses go before the public who already view Romney as “MILK TOAST” turn him into BURNT TOAST?

How far do the Coulters and Drudges care to go before their credibility is TOTALLY SHOT? The public is looking for THE FACTS not more BLATANT spins and lies from people that were once considered trusted media sources.

As much as Obama supporters or the US citizen ignorant of the “NBC” definition want to bury their heads in the sand … that pesky little issue of “natural born citizenship” WILL NOT GO AWAY.

Nor will it until it finally creeps its way into the Supreme Court for settlement.

For anyone willing to take the time to look into the congressional records of THAT TIME it is clear that “natural born citizen” is clearly defined as a child born IN THE US of PARENTS who are citizens thereof.

That very simple “term definition” from John Bingham (author of the 14th ammendment) found in … 39th Congress Senate and House Debates (December 4, 1865 to July 28, 1866) PP Page 961 of 1920 Page 1291.
Image of that page can be seen HERE.

That says: “[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of PARENTS not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…. . . ”

Anyone looking at that definition WITHOUT BIAS understands it to mean BORN IN THE USA OF TWO (2) CITIZEN PARENTS.

Now it can be argued until the cows come home IF, IF, IF or WHY, MAYBE? … and has been already.
Frankly I do not care who influenced who, how they arrived at or who just plucked the term out of the air.
I only care that they did and it was recorded in simple ENGLISH TEXT for those who can still understand BASIC ENGLISH.

I have yet to find any argument cropping up in Congressional records (for that period) which argues or redefines that specific term “natural born citizen”.

The movement being launched to keep Barack Obama off the official state ballots in election 2012 has began.
Rightfully Judge Michael Malihi has taken up the case, refused the Obama quash requests and ordered him to appear.

The door has now been cracked.
This hearing is a BIG DEAL!
WHY?

It was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. Obama never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated. His supporters, meanwhile, argue he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.

WHAT A SURPRISE! Obama and his lawyer did not show up.
So now what?
Well the hearing went on without him.
Blow by blow results are below:

By Sharon Rondeau
The Post & Email (site is under maintenance at time of publishing; see The Post & Email for further details on this and other Obama eligibility cases, documentation, and history)

(Jan. 26, 2012) — The court convened at approximately 9:30 a.m. Judge Michael Malihi began by asking those present to stand and reading the last paragraph of Atty. Michael Jablonski’s letter to Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, “into the record,” commenting that Jablonski was not present at the hearing.

The judge called plaintiff David Welden to stand and asked where he resided and if he were a registered voter in the state of Georgia. Then his attorney, Van Irion, stood and stated that there were three types of citizenship in the United States. He then provided argument on the definition of “natural born Citizen,” referring to Minor v. Happersett.

“The court should recognize that the term ‘citizen” is not ‘natural born Citizen,’ Irion said. “The Minor court’s definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ says ‘parents.’

“In closing, this case is about the Constitution,” Irion said. We’ve shown that Barack Obama’s father was never a citizen…and that means he is not constitutionally qualified…Finally, the defendant was ordered to be here, and I wish to state on the record that that shows not just a contempt for this court…”

Then Irion was interrupted and stopped speaking.

9:54 a.m.: Atty. J. Mark Hatfield stood and stating that he represents Kevin Richard Powell and Carl Swensson. Hatfield mentioned the White House schedule as he saw that it related to Obama’s lack of attendance at the hearing.

Carl Swensson was sworn in at 9:56 a.m. and stated his residence and county. Then Kevin Powell was asked the same. Both were asked if they were able to vote for President of the United States.

Swensson and Powell explained their challenges filed with the Secretary of State’s office to the judge.

Hatfield held up the Certification of Nomination which Nancy Pelosi signed in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot. The judge asked if it was a “certified copy,” and Hatfield answered that it was. He then read from it, stating that it did not affirm that the candidates met constitutional requirements to serve, while the wording from the Republican National Committee for its candidates did contain that wording.

The judge asked if the documents were from a “United States government source,” and Hatfield answered “Yes, sir, they were.”

Hatfield cited Jablonski’s January 25 letter “indicating that they did not want the proceedings to go forward and did not want to participate.” Hatfield also entered into evidence Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father.

Ken Allen, a resident of Arizona, stood to present the documentation he had received from the State Department after submitting a FOIA request early in 2009, which The Post & Email reported on here. He stated that “Barack Obama Sr.” was “never a citizen.”

At 10:09 a.m. someone said, “Let’s take a short break,” and people stood up and began moving around and talking with one another.

At 10:17 a.m., the court was called back in to order.

Atty. Orly Taitz was called upon to speak. The Georgia registered voter whom she represents, David Farrar, stood and identified himself.

Taitz utilized a projector on the wall to the right of the judge as an aid in her presentation. She then stated that evidence existed that Obama possessed Indonesian citizenship, to which the judge was heard by this writer to say, “That’s not relevant.” Taitz then discussed the court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett and was interrupted by the judge, who said, “Counselor, can you save your argument for the closing?” She then stopped speaking.

Mr. Christopher Strunk of New York then went up to the front of the courtroom to testify, and Taitz began to ask him questions about the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, one of which contains the name “Soebarkah.” Strunk stated, “She wanted that expunged from her record, but we never got that.”

Susan Daniels, Private Investigator from Ohio, then took the stand, and spoke about her investigation which revealed that Obama had reportedly been using a social security number which she contended had not been assigned to him.

Taitz asked Daniels, “What was the social security number attached to your request?” and Daniels read off “042-68-4425.” Daniels said, “In all my years, I’ve never seen anything like this.” She stated that the person who had originally owned the number had been born in 1890.

“First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC. It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’” Daniels stated that she obtained information “directly from the Social Security Administration.”

At 10:30 Mr. Chito Papa took the stand. He stated that he works in the field of Information Technology including Adobe® software.

Taitz asked Papa if the “birth certificate” which “Obama posted online” had flattened layers. ”Did you see one layer or multiple layers? Taitz asked. ”I saw multiple layers,” he answered.

Taitz asked Papa about Obama’s social security number which appeared on his tax return posted on the internet, and Papa stated that the layers had not been flattened. Taitz then thanked Papa for his testimony.

At 10:36 a.m. another witness, Linda Jordan, was called to the stand. Taitz adjusted her Powerpoint presentation by means of a laptop computer and began by asking a question about “E-Verify,” the U.S. government’s system for flagging potential illegal immigrants from working. Jordan stated that she ran Obama’s number through the E-Verify system and said, “When I read it, it was 2011, and it could not verify it. It came back.”

At 10:39 a.m., Douglas Vogt took the stand. Vogt stated that he owns a typesetting company and has been “in the business for 18 years now.”

Taitz asked Vogt if he examined the birth certificate which was posted online, and he said, “Yes, I did.” He stated that “sloping lines” would not be seen if the image had been made from a paper document.

Taitz asked, “Would you expect to see a clear embossed seal on the document?” and Vogt answered, “Yes, I would.” However, he stated that such was not present on Obama’s birth certificate. Regarding the number of Obama’s purported birth record, Vogt stated that “federal regs” require that “all birth certificate numbers have to be sequential, starting on January 1.”

At 10:49, witness John Sampson took the stand. He stated that he has a background in criminal justice, served as a police officer in New York City and worked as an immigration inspector. His background includes working for the INS in the area of “immigration fraud” and he was also a deportation officer. He stated that he has testified in front of “federal grand juries.” He stated that he started his own consulting firm in 2009 and has been self-employed since then.

Taitz asked Sampson about Obama’s social security number, and Sampson said that he “ran” the number 042-68-4425 and that it was assigned to Obama since 1977.

Taitz asked if Sampson had examined the birth certificate, and he said, “Yes.” He raised the issue of the Nordyke twins’ birth certificate, whose numbers were lower than Obama’s even though their birth occurred a day later. He stated that the registrar’s name was different than that on the Nordyke twins’ documents and that it was unlikely that the registrar would have been different in the “same hospital” regarding births one day apart.

Sampson recommended further investigation, including subpoenas and court orders, to obtain more information on the number “042-68-4425.”

Sampson mentioned that Obama has also been known as “Barry Soetoro.”

Taitz asked what Sampson thought needed to be done regarding the questions about Obama’s background, and he recommended asking for an official copy of the SS-5 for his social security number application and the Hawaii Department of Health to see “if he was born in Hawaii.” Sampson stated that an investigation would be “a criminal investigation” through a U.S. attorney’s office. He said that if a person has been found to be impersonating a U.S. citizen, he would be subject to “deportation.”

Shortly thereafter, Sampson’s testimony ended, and Taitz began discussing Obama’s alleged years in Indonesia from 1968-71, during which he was known as “Barry Soetoro.”

“We have another boy who from 1968-69 was in Hawaii,” she said. The judge then said, “Are you testifying? Do you know how?” which brought laughter from the assembly. The judge then said she could discuss the matter during closing arguments. Taitz responded, “I would like to testify,” after which she took the stand.

Taitz stated that “Mr. Obama has resigned from the bar.” The judge asked, “How is that relevant?” Taitz said that it was pertinent because Obama was “hiding his identity.”

“I’m going to ask you to submit your testimony in writing,” the judge said. ”OK,” Taitz said. She then left the stand and spoke from the assembly once again. She stated that “We have clear evidence of fraud and forgery…Mr. Obama has used other last names…” She then stated that of all the lawsuits filed against Obama regarding his eligibility, none were heard on “the merits.” Taitz asked Judge Malihi to order the release of Obama’s records in Hawaii and to hold Obama in “contempt of court” for failing to appear at the hearing.

The judge said, “Thank you” and adjourned the court at 11:12 a.m.

Article II Facts

Looks like he is.
Apparently Barack Obama was never taught respect is earned it is not simply gifted TO ANYONE.

It has been pretty clear from the start Barack Obama is narcissistic.
Did he step into it this time with a strong finger pointing Governor taking issue with his thin skinned bad behavior over her book entry?
One willing to stand her ground?
Looks like!

Barack Obama knows how to do ONE THING.
CAMPAIGN.
He has done it non stop since he took oath of office.
Was he barked that ANYONE could possibly criticize him?

You might want to notice at 1:44 on the video Leslie Marshall thinks they are both smiling.
Smiling?
Looks like a cat spat to me but you be the judge.

Anyway this time around under the microscope of THE PEOPLE VIA THE INTERNET … no matter which way he squirms he will be caught on tape. The tape will go viral and he will over and over expose himself.

Fortunately with the abundance of video equipment out there nothing much will escape the internet blogosphere.

I resisted my urge to ignore the State of the Union Address by Barack Obama the other nite.
Thank heaven for DVR.

I have to admit it is easy to see how the American lemming herd could be mesmerized by Barack Obama.

To bad for him any of us paying attention to the actual state of this Union knew immediately every smooth word that flowed from his mouth was either delusion or duplicitous lies.

The thing that totally amazes me is Obama and followers use the EXACT SAME RHETORIC as the Republicans.
Only thing is OBAMA DOES NOT MEAN A WORD IT!

The light of the evening ended up being a speech made my Mitch Daniels.
Certainly worth a listen if you did not catch it then.