White House “Nouveau Riche”
It is indeed interesting to watch the new class less couple in the whitehouse.
From “not a pot” to “excess billions” at the tax payers expense.
It’s pretty easy to spend spend spend when it is not yours and that is what we see with our new head of state. It seems neither the President or his first lady have the common sense of a 4 year old. Some of the things going on in their everyday life is actually becoming downright laughable.
I find it more than hypocritical that Obama PREACHES “tighten your belts” when he apparently has no belt. Apparently the new leader does not realize you gain respect by “practicing what you preach” … oh but why should he? We are footing the bill.
First we have an expensive uncalled for NYC flyover to the tune of how much WASTED CASH?
Move over Joe Bidden the first lady is close on your heels with? Who the heck opened the cage doors?
First Lady Michelle Obama steps out in Lanvin sneakers and they’re only $540!
Glenn Beck wrote a piece about Rush Linbaugh for “Time 100”
“No matter how many new technologies pop up, nothing will ever surpass the intimacy of radio. And nobody will ever be better at utilizing it than Rush. His consistency, insight and honesty have earned him a level of trust with his listeners that politicians can only dream of. And that is why the more irrelevant critics try to make him, the more relevant he becomes.”
U.S. Supreme Court justice Justice Clarence Thomas is offering some legal insight about the so-called Fairness Doctrine, suggesting the off-the-books policy could be declared unconstitutional if it’s revived and brought before the bench.
In written discussion on yesterday’s ruling cracking down on indecent language on television, Justice Clarence Thomas called the policy “problematic” and a “deep intrusion into the First Amendment rights of broadcasters.”
The doctrine requiring broadcasters to air opposing viewpoints on controversial issues was brought to an end in the 1980s under the direction of President Ronald Reagan’s Federal Communications Commission.
Excerpt from: Muslims: ‘We do that on first dates’ by Ann Coulter
“The CIA’s interrogation techniques couldn’t be more ridiculous if they were out of Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition sketch:”
- Cardinal! Poke her with the soft cushions! …
- Hmm! She is made of harder stuff! Cardinal Fang! Fetch … THE COMFY CHAIR!
- So you think you are strong because you can survive the soft cushions. Well, we shall see. Biggles! Put her in the Comfy Chair! …
- Now – you will stay in the Comfy Chair until lunchtime, with only a cup of coffee at 11.
Have you ever wondered how to wrap your mind around all of this millions and trillions the government is talking about? Take a look at the definition of this cleaver young man. Then next time you listen to Obama tell you how HE IS managing things and fixing the debt? You will actually understand what a fraud he actually is.
Obama is suppose to be a man with an IQ of 178?
My estimation is 80 and that might be high.
Actually none of us know for sure because we have seen nothing real of his records … only his own made up history. Anyone on the internet for any length of time at all knows how easy it is for frauds to manufacture an inflated history.
Mises Daily by Doug French | Posted on 4/29/2009 12:00:00 AM
Obama’s 100th day is upon us and the new president is ramping up an expansion of government that will place him alongside some of the most notorious dictators in history. CNN’s senior political analyst Bill Schneider may believe Obama’s personal qualities make him “the superpresident,” but first and foremost, Obama with his $3.5 trillion budget sees himself as the new FDR, armed with a new New Deal.
But the New Deal wasn’t new when FDR did it. The charismatic Roosevelt was more than 200 years behind John Law’s Mississippi Bubble, described as “the first New Deal of the capitalist order,” by John T. Flynn in his amazing book Men of Wealth.
In a chapter devoted to the money magician, Flynn cleverly calls Law the “evangelist of abundance.” And conditions in France could not have been riper for Law’s fiscal chicanery in 1715. France was completely ruined by Louis XIV, a ruler whom history has been much too kind to, according to Flynn. He ravaged the country he ruled, while being a “shallow, egotistical, pretentious coxcomb.”
Louis spent vast millions on his palaces and engaged poets and writers to write of his virtues, long before the days of CNN. As Flynn explains, industry had not come to France, thus the king stole his wealth from small farmers and city-dwelling artisans through oppressive taxation.
I was searching the net for images of the MORONIC NYC Flyover Photo op when I happened on to an article by the “Angry White Guy”. I loved his piece because I feel it is a typical response for more than half of the people in the USA today. I do for a fact know a number of people who voted for Obama and today are ever so sorry they were duped (by HOPE) into the insanity we suffer today. The key question to those of us who WERE NOT DUPED … is when will they belly up to the bar and ADMIT they were duped to the world.
Ah the EGO is indeed an interesting thing.
The White House says it cost $328,835.00 but does that included the coming investigation? The damage control? The lost work in NYC and Jersey? The emotional toll? The dozens and dozens of coming meeting to find out why they are so stupid and how to be a little less stupid in the future? Nope those cost have not been calculated yet so…
Between the lost work, the evacuations and the cost of JP5 jet fuel to fly Air force One and couple of F-16’s to New York city to take a damn picture, Obama once again demonstrates he has no clue, so while they tell CEO’s not to fly their jets, the White House flies theirs to take a damn photo… at low levels, over ground zero, genius. Maybe Obama has forgotten 9/11 after all he was only 40 at the time, but it would seems those in NYC have not, maybe now many of his supporters there will get a clue, probably not.
My question is, could they not go out and spend $500.00 on Photoshop or even $80 on Photoshop Elements and Photoshop Air Force One in front of the Statue of Liberty? That’s why they flew it up there and didn’t tell anyone, they wanted to photograph it in front of Lady Liberty… does morons cover that? Gawd these people are not only stupid they are arrogant too.
Here I’ll Photoshop it for them…(ooooh it took 3 minutes) I’ll expect my check within 30 days.
UPDATE: Obama claims he knew nothing about the AF1 flyby, I’m calling it what it is BULLSHIT! He knew about it, he has to know where that plane is at at all times as a security measure, PERIOD! He knew and he is lying when he said he didn’t know, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit! Now I usually avoid using my Marine Corps honed language when I post, but that’s all it is and all it will ever be. Pure BS! He has a 9/10 mentality OR was he testing the fear waters of NYC? I mean if a plane flew low over NYC and there wasn’t panic then he could call the terror threats over, but there was fear and panic and proof that people haven’t forgotten 9/11 even if Obama has. And Robert Gibbs that dimwit saying he’d have to ask the White House about the fly over, Gibbs you moron you’re the White House spokes person!! They’re idiots that think the world revolves around them and Obama has yet to apologize to the people of NYC, but he says he is furious… bullshit. I’m sick of this asshole not knowing anything or not being old enough to be involved with something, this worthless son of a bitch needs to step up to the plate and stop passing the buck.
In a memo the Federal Aviation Administration’s James Johnston said the agency was aware of “the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes” in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor’s office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.
IF THE SECRET GOT OUT???? How in the hell are you going to fly a 747 followed by two F-16’s 1500 feet off the ground along the skyline of New York City and expect no one to notice it? Tell me that?!! Answer me dammit!! Maybe no one will notice that big ass gorilla on the Empire State Building either!
HERE IS AN IDEA…
Some New Yorkers need to sue Obama under the Federal Tort Claims Act for intentional inflictions of emotional distress. Make it a class action. BTW I get a 1/3.
So someone in the White House thought it would be a good idea to have Air Force One fly over NYC the site of the terrorist biggest success. And why pick NYC instead of Baltimore, Washington or any other city? Who ever came up with the idea was celebrating Allah’s deliverance of the White House into Muslim hands. Eight years after 9-11 the worlds Muslims can rejoice. Allah has placed one of his disciples into the White House and the fly over was symbolic of that triumph. Allah had triumphed over the infidels and here was proof, Air Force One flying over the hollowed ground zero. The sacrifice was worth it. Victory of Allah over the infidels. The chosen one is in control of the infidels.
The Air Force took the hit for the publicity stunt. What would you expect? The real culprit take responsibility? Not a chance. I can assure you there is no way the Air Force would ever do such an idiotic thing. No way. Not part of the mission. Not how they think. The idea for the publicity stunt came from a Muslim or Muslim sympathizer inside the White House. The enemy is inside the walls and the main stream media ignores the blatant pro Islamic fascism even when it flies over their heads
Mises Daily by Clifford F. Thies | Posted on 4/28/2009 12:00:00 AM
Can states secede? There are three levels on which this question can be answered:
The Inalienable Right of Secession
The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America invokes the self-evident truths that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that governments are formed to protect these rights and gain their just powers from the consent of the governed, and that when a government becomes abusive of these rights, it is the right — no, it is the duty — of the people to alter or abolish that government.
To say governments were formed to protect the rights of men would be historically incorrect. Almost all governments were formed by ruthless men exerting their will over others through the use of force. Some governments, over time, evolved toward the rule of law, perhaps only because their rulers saw that this would sanction their own continued enjoyment of the wealth that they possessed. In some instances, this evolution involved one or more “revolutions” in which those who were governed were able to better establish the rule of law.