This is no surprise.
The powers that be in Washington have a mode of operation.
If you disagree with US … SHUT UP !
If you don’t WE WILL SHUT YOU UP !

Do any of you know ONE (1) thing the government does well other than spend OUR MONEY (money they do not even have yet)?

So why on earth do I want them to regulate what any of us say or hear?
What exactly is it they fail to understand about the people listen to what they WANT TO LISTEN TO?
Is it not evidant that the Main Stream Media is quickly biting the dust because of the government propoganda they spew?
Apparently the true problem is most of us ARE NOT falling for the “Mushroom S***” they are trying to force feed us.

This is one issue we all better leap on like ugly on a stick.

Maybe some impeachment efforts need to be started nation wide?
All we need to do is start somewhere … pour our grassroots dollars into one area until that person is gone.
It only takes one person GONE to whip others in line.

Unless the rest are up for political suicide that is.

Take a gander at the latest clip:

By Aaron Klein
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

JERUSALEM – President Obama’s newly confirmed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, drew up a “First Amendment New Deal,” a new “Fairness Doctrine” that would include the establishment of a panel of “nonpartisan experts” to ensure “diversity of view” on the airwaves, WND has learned.

Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation of the U.S. to impose new rules that outlawed segregation.

Until now, Sunstein’s radical proposal, set forth in his 1993 book “The Partial Constitution,” received no news media attention and scant scrutiny.

In the book – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein outwardly favors and promotes the “fairness doctrine,” the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed was “equitable and balanced.”

Sunstein introduces what he terms his “First Amendment New Deal” to regulate broadcasting in the U.S.

Full story …

So Van Jones resigns?
Out of the goodness of his heart right?
Anyone who believes Barack Obama does not know EXACTLY what Jones is has ROCKS FOR BRAINS!

No doubt all of the dirt being dug up on the so called “NOT CZARS” is starting to cause a bit of concern in the WhiteHouse.

Concern NOT BECAUSE our President dislikes the behavior, mindset or actions of said “NOT CZARS” but because “we the people” are finding out.

Light on a subject the population knows nothing about is an amazing thing. (where is the lazy corrupt main stream media on this?)

Thanks to Glenn Beck and his last weeks of ferreting out key information on not only Van Jones but John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Ezekiel Emanuel to name a few.

The average Joe and Jane work hard … come home from work and flick on the news … unfortunately the main stream media is silent about what is really going on.
They are silent why?
Not because they are clue less but because the are flat out corrupt also.
So Joe and Jane remain clue less and worse propagandized. Slowly that situation is changing. There is nothing better in the world than a true GRASSROOTS revolution … one sparked by passion and love of country.

Clearly a revolution the Obama puppet masters did not expect.
These are not only interesting but historical times my friends.
Are the politicians in Washington braced for political suicide if they decide to defy those who pay their salaries?
We all watch and wait.

I would imagine in order to save face they will quickly try and shove something through so they can AT LEAST claim some kind of a win.
Will it work?
I am betting on a public that apparently is FAR MORE informed than those who are at the switch casting votes to pass these bills without reading, understanding and open debate.

Daily “we the people” are subject to the “WE POWER” of the elitist Washington Bureaucrats.
In lay terminology that means SCREW the “we the people” because they do not know anything anyway and THEY MIGHT toss a monkey wrench into the WORKS WE (the elitist Washington Bureaucrats) ARE TRYING TO FOIST ON THEM … should they figure it out.

THE ISSUE:

WASHINGTON – Barack Obama’s nominee (Cass Sunstein) for “regulatory czar” has advocated a “Fairness Doctrine” for the Internet that would require opposing opinions be linked and also has suggested angry e-mails should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour cooling off period.

The revelations about Cass Sunstein, Obama’s friend from the University of Chicago Law School and nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, come in a new book by Brad O’Leary, “Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech.” OIRA will oversee regulation throughout the U.S. government.

Sunstein also has argued in his prolific literary works that the Internet is anti-democratic because of the way users can filter out information of their own choosing.

“A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government,” he wrote. “Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom’s name.”

Whole story at: MEDIA MATTERS

Well of course it isn’t (for those like Sunstein). Thinking people … willing to voice their opinion do make it harder for them to be enslaved. You know that old adage “2 heads (or maybe 100) are better than one” thing?

What Washington DOES NOT WANT is the public THINKING ON ITS OWN much less putting it into print on the internet for posterity.

Funny thing about the internet. As Google, Yahoo and the other search engine technology gets better and better the Washington elitist is more and more at risk of said elitist BEING EXPOSED for exactly what they are (whatever that might be).

Check it out for yourself. Pull up Google and type in Nancy Pelosi … SURPRISE! … you get 4,060,000 pages referencing our esteemed Speaker of the House. Don’t you think San Fran Nan would LOVE all of the NOT SO GLOWING information be removed from that data bank? …. ROFL (rolling on the floor laughing) … kind of a duh question don’t ya think?

Do the same for Cass Sunstein … well only 352,000 pages … probably not nearly as much negative stuff because to date he is virtually an unknown to “we the people”.

The point is in all of those 4,060,000 and 352,000 pages DON’T YOU THINK a smart “we the people” person could sift through the mass and figure it out for him/herself?
Looks like a pretty adequate system using free speech as far as I can see. What do you think?

It is probably a good idea if “WE THE PEOPLE” rise up and squash this ASSAULT ON FREE SPEECH IMMEDIATELY!

Just a heads up on how this works in the real world. 13 years ago in my activist days I wrote an exposing piece on a certain doctor. Anytime today when ANYONE runs a search on his name? … guess what? … that exposure piece comes up on the first page in Google right under his educational credentials.

THAT MY FRIENDS IS WHY THEY WANT TO SHUT US UP! … make no mistake that is exactly what all of this is designed to do no matter how they candy coat it.