Tit for Tat!

May 13, 2009
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 13:53 PM

shuster

I started to NOTICE the shift when Bill Clinton got hammered with MonicaGate. When everything really hit the fan in that incident I realized why my innate instinct about the man as being a number one sleazebag piece of pond scum was more than an innate instinct but in fact true.

I further noticed that the left did not give a fig about the fact that the leader of our country stood in front of the public and claimed “I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN” … had the “little black dress” never surfaced we would no doubt be arguing the point to this day. An Monica would have been trashed by Clinton and the media just like Flower had already been.

Personally I did not care if Clinton had sex with the goat down the road but what I did care about was the man felt it was okay to blatantly lie to the mass. What I further cared about was the pass given for those who loved his political agenda. “Oh whatever he does is okay as long as we get our way.” The next thing I noticed was the liberals that I was fighting side by side with … for stopping the crosscutting of old growth forest sported this same hypocrisy. Then when Bush began his run for office what was good for Clinton was not okay for Bush who they hated before his running shoes actually hit the ground.

Since my tolerance level for hypocrites and inequality is less than zero … I pulled my organization out of the fight and let their group die a fast death. It did.

During the past 8 years I began to notice how the media which was clearly left viciously attacked anyone they thought sneezed wrong. When the weapons of mass destruction “lies” started to be bandied … my reaction was HEY WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? what’s good for the goose is good for the gander right?

Apparently not.
HYPOCRISY FRONT AND CENTER!

With this ever increasing bad behavior being directed at Republicans while Democrats were being given a pass I found myself wondering … hey wait a gosh darn minute here. Are you going to let them get away with this without defending yourselves?

Well they did and now we see the result of that failure.

Fast forward to now … today.
Where did MSNBC dredge up this piece of S*** David Shuster?
If those targeted will not stand up for themselves … let me help.
I have no qualms about calling a spade a spade on the exact same level as anyone throwing the first stone.
No wonder MSNBC has hit the rating skids as anyone with an ounce of common sense is scampering to ANY OTHER network like cockroaches when someone flicks on a light.

So Shuster thinks Carrie Prejean is not free to speak her mind because it is contrary to his opinion?
Tit for Tat … I don’t think he should have the freedom to counter her opinion on national TV.
So applying the what is good for the goose is good for the gander technique how is the situation remedied?
We the people do not write MSNBC about this jerkwater. You pay attention to those who sponsor his show and write them. Amazing how far a simple “I will no longer purchase your product as long as you sponsor the David Shuster show” will go. Sponsors are quickly yanked back into line when their bottom line profits are threatened.

So in truth “we the people” actually have more power if we choose to use it.

You decide.


Does it pay to miff the public?

April 20, 2009
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 12:33 PM

cooperWhen you make your bread and butter off the public it would be wise to protect your position by not pissing said public off.

Apparently CNN’s Anderson Cooper, who made repeated “teabagging” references, and MSNBC’s David Shuster, who said, “Teabagging day for the right wing and they are going nuts for it.” … were stupid enough to forget that rule of thumb.

Or maybe they are so use to being stupid and the public either accepting or ignoring it daily they simply figured they would get away without repercussion.

How many ways can you say WRONG! ?

I have to tell you with the mood of the day changing moment by moment as the “we the people of the USA” giant awakens … those in the media or public service with a cushy job best take note.

The FCC has received complaints as well it should. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

We the people have a voice and most of us can shout long and hard enough to eventually BE HEARD.

Add your 2 cents at the FCC complaint page HERE:


R rated CNN and MSNBC?

April 16, 2009
Posted by clinicalthinker @ 8:57 AM

My my what is this world coming to?
The other night while watching CNN and MSNBC I thought I picked up several more than over the top sexually R rated slurs in regards to the “tea-parties”.

My first response was NAHHHH. Must have been a slip of the brain with those who uttered them.

Apparently I was not the only one to notice. Seems like others caught the lewd joke foisted on the public by CNN’s Anderson Cooper as he insulted the grass-roots Tea Parties that blanketed the United States this week.

The comment:
“It’s hard to talk when you’re tea-bagging.”

The comment parallels the “tea-bagging” term commonly used in the homosexual community to describe a homosexual act in which testicles are inserted in someone’s mouth.

Greg Gutfeld and the Red Eye group do a great job of skewering Cooper and his ilk over the “teabagging” comments.

Imagine the weeping, wailing and absolute howls of outrage that would be coming from the left had any of this been uttered by the right about a NOW rally.
MSM hypocrisy at its finest by CNN and MSNBC and the agents that govern them.

Personally I think both Cooper and Shuster should get the Imus treatment to be “fair and balanced”.

A mini re-cap by Fox News:

CNN anchor Anderson Cooper interspersed “teabagging” references with analyst David Gergen’s more staid commentary on how Republicans are still “searching for their voice.”

“It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging,” Cooper explained. Gergen laughed, but Cooper kept a straight face.

MSNBC’s David Shuster weaved a tapestry of “Animal House” humor Monday as he filled in for Countdown host Keith Olbermann.

The protests, he explained, amount to “Teabagging day for the right wing and they are going nuts for it.”

He described the parties as simultaneously “full-throated” and “toothless,” and continued: “They want to give President Obama a strong tongue-lashing and lick government spending.” Shuster also noted how the protesters “whipped out” the demonstrations this past weekend.