For those of you who faithfully follow this blog WE THANK YOU!

It allows me to believe there is still hope for our great nation.

It tells me little by little “WE THE MIDDLE GROUND” are starting to wake up, stand shoulder to shoulder and ready ourselves to REMAIN FREE.

The enemy? … Socialism, Marxism and Communism to name a few.
WE KNOW WHO THE PROMOTERS of those agendas are. Unfortunately some of those promoters are deeply seated in our government.

While they stand at a podium and spout “I believe in the Constitution” hoping to con us all … it is clear to us they are either ignorant of our founding documents OR THEY LIE.

The attack on “State Sovereignty” and the people with the blessings of our President, Congress and SCOTUS only indicates what trouble we face.

We the people have handed over our unalienable sovereign rights as individuals to our “state representatives” who have given it to the “Federal Government”.

How did this happen?

Folks today we live in an upside down America.

Remember!
We the People RULE!
The GOVERNMENT both State and Federal … are at OUR COMMAND.
NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!

So now we are faced with a 2 prong battle.

1. Our freedom … we are being forced to wrest the power from those who abuse it for their own agenda. Place it back in the hands of the sovereign individual. That can not happen until the individual is willing to step up to the plate and become responsible FOR HIS OWN FATE.

2. Our economy … those in charge of the government purse strings have squandered our wealth in gay abandon.

They expect “we the people” to foot the bill FOR EVERYTHING WORLDWIDE.

We have accepted that WHY?

This government ALL OF THEM BOTH SIDES … have run this wealthy nation into a miserable debt situation that is on the brink of collapse.

Understand this!
NONE OF THIS IS BY ACCIDENT
OUR MONITARY SYSTEM WORLD WIDE is like a game of monopoly to those who manage the purse strings.

This system is a mouse click away from obscurity.
Poof now you see it now you don’t!

It is manipulated in this manner by the Federal Reserve and International monetary system. They count on “we the people” to keep that system rolling by the sweat of our brow. As the working class dwindles, those not working add further burden to an already top heavy system.

It does not take rocket science to realize we have reached THAT tipping point.

So what do we do?
Without FREEDOM money DOES NOT MATTER.

How do we gain our freedom back?

Take it back!

We do it with the tools our fore fathers founded this GREAT NATION ON!
We do it one person at a time as we each stand ALONE and at the same time UNITE WITH ONE ANOTHER.

It is time to give up what divides us
(THAT IS THEIR TOOL TO RULE US).
Time to work on our common goal … FREEDOM.

Does everyone want FREEDOM?
No! … we DO NOT need to convince them WE JUST HAVE TO OUTNUMBER THEM!

So it is NOT “yes we can” or “yes I can” … it is
“YES WE MUST”

Here is where WE MUST START.

The Constitution and the “natural born citizen” clause.

Time to pull off the blinders and understand Barack Obama DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

It looks as though NEITHER DOES Mitt Romney.

Do not kid yourself THIS MATTER IS OF KEY IMPORTANTS TO OUR FREEDOM.

ANY POLITITION who refuses to address this issue NEEDS TO BE DROPPED FROM OFFICE OR ROSTER TO GAIN OFFICE.

QUESTION WITH BOLDNESS!

Accept no other answer than the last defining SCOTUS ruling on “natural born citizen” which clearly states in Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.”

More Reference on the subject:

JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED US SUPREME COURT OPINIONS.

The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.

I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, “Minor v. Happersett”, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waite’s statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).
The whole story …

Mario Apuzzo

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38057

UPDATE: FACT: With the release of the Obama BC a couple of weeks ago. Instead of clearing up the matter of his birth. He has raised more and more questions. Even his supporters are scratching their heads in wonder WHY HE SPENT OVER 2 MILLION covering up what was presented?

Apparently that document has some big issues that will be ironed out quickly as soon as OBAMA is booted out of office by the people or perhaps before if we are all lucky.

However today we are down to the brass tacks of the matter.
The legal matter. Barack Obama is not and never was eligible to be President under the “natural born citizen” REQIREMENT of the Constitution.

The snivel, whine and I OBJECT din from liberal/progressives, Obama supporters, the ignorant and those who have no ability to logically reason is interesting but NOT A SURPRISE.

This issue has 3 commenters: Ellen, Ohioborn and Ohioborn1. (you can read the exchange if you want to be bored to tears under the comments at the bottom of this article.

These 3 commenters are one in the same. I can only guess why this person thought they should change their handle … perhaps they feel there is safety in numbers? Immature and silly but what the hey … LOL
Or that the more people who spout the same WRONG LOGIC somehow make that logic CORRECT?

Personally I have quit trying to figure out why liberal/progressives think the way they think.
I acquiesce to Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., a forensic psychiatrist … it is simply a mental illness.
One can not argue logic with anyone without the ability to understand/utilize common logic.

———————————————————

Since Barack Obama was backed into a corner by Donald Trump and was forced by public polls to show his long form birth-certificate. More questions have arisen.

Here is the TRUE FIGHT and ONLY FIGHT NOW.
The birth-certificate NO LONGER MATTERS.
Obama has painted himself into a corner.
Let me make it clear how.

Is the long form legit?
Is it forged?
It does not matter! If the document is forged Obama is a confirmed liar.

Now Obama has given us legal evidence that his father was actually Obama Sr.
Sr. WAS NOT either born here nor naturalized here in the USA.
So Jr. NEVER WAS QUALIFIED as “NATURAL BORN”.

So today Obama SUPPORTERS are thrown into a tizzy trying to make “IT” into something other than it. They are citing case law and opinions galore that are relative to NOTHING.
They are trying to convince the public that: THAT APPLE is a BANANA.
Is it working?
For his avid supporters? … they do not care as long as their guy APPEARS VALID.
For the thinking public? … not so easy.
If the thinking public does their own research with an open mind? … not at all!

I have harped and harped on the John Bingham document that I stumbled upon in 2009. It has been posted and referenced here a number of times. It makes it abundantly clear today (amid the shrieks and howls of the Obama supporters) exactly what our founding fathers meant in their SPACIFIC REQUIREMENT of “natural born citizen” FOR ANY SEEKER of President or Vice President to the USA.

Still the Obama supporters want to say Bingham does not count. I have argued these same facts ad nausium on youtube for years now. Do I expect it to sink in for them? Not at all! However what is beginning to happen is the thinking public are becomming educated to what our founding fathers intended.
It is becomming clear that THEY (OUR FOUNDING FATHERS) EXPECTED HIS (Barack Obama) KIND OF ATTACK AND WANTED TO FORESTALL IT.
NEWSFLASH GUYS!
Until the SCOTUS rules different the founding fathers DEFINITION STANDS!
You do not get to cherry pick YOUR OWN MEANING for YOUR OWN AGENDA or that of Barack Obama.

This is what I ran into today so I will post it here for all to see:

Justice Hugo Black in DUNCAN v LOUISIANA Indicates Obama Would Not Be Eligible: Ineligibility Echoed by Former Attorney General Jeremiah Black

United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Hugo Black, in a concurring opinion in Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968), emphasizes his reliance upon the statements made by Representative Bingham and Senator Howard in Congress which pertain to the drafting and adoption of the 14th Amendment. Justice Black stated that “it is far wiser to rely on” the words of Bingham and Howard when analyzing the 14th Amendment.

This is crucial to understanding that Obama is not eligible to be President as it provides the strongest Supreme Court statement – post Wong Kim Ark – indicating that the current occupant of the White House is not in legal possession of the office of President.

Here is the relevant statement by Justice Black:

“Professor Fairman’s “history” relies very heavily on what was not said in the state legislatures that passed on the Fourteenth Amendment. Instead of relying on this kind of negative pregnant, my legislative experience has convinced me that it is far wiser to rely on what was said, and, most importantly, said by the men who actually sponsored the Amendment in the Congress. I know from my years in the United States Senate that it is to men like Congressman Bingham, who steered the Amendment through the House, and Senator Howard, who introduced it in the Senate, that members of Congress look when they seek the real meaning of what is being offered. And they vote for or against a bill based on what the sponsors of that bill and those who oppose it tell them it means.” (Emphasis added.)

A few weeks ago, I published a report entitled, “The House of Representatives Definition of “Natural Born Citizen” = Born of Citizen Parents in the US“. (Please review that report now as I have directly re-posted from it below.)

During a debate (see pg. 2791) regarding a certain Dr. Houard, who had been incarcerated in Spain, the issue was raised on the floor of the House of Representatives as to whether the man was a US citizen. Representative Bingham (of Ohio), stated on the floor:

“As to the question of citizenship I am willing to resolve all doubts in favor of a citizen of the United States. That Dr. Houard is a natural-born citizen of the United States there is not room for the shadow of a doubt. He was born of naturalized parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, and by the express words of the Constitution, as amended to-day, he is declared to all the world to be a citizen of the United States by birth.” (The term “to-day”, as used by Bingham, means “to date”. Obviously, the Constitution had not been amended on April 25, 1872.)

Notice that Bingham declares Houard to be a “natural-born citizen” by citing two factors – born of citizen parents in the US.

John Bingham, aka “father of the 14th Amendment”, was an abolitionist congressman from Ohio who prosecuted Lincoln’s assassins. Ten years earlier, he stated on the House floor:

“All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862))

Then in 1866, Bingham also stated on the House floor:

“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))

According to Justice Black, Bingham’s words uttered on the floor of the House are the most reliable source. Bingham made three statements, none of them challenged on the Floor, which indicate that a natural born citizen is a person born on US soil to parents who were US citizens. Obama does not fit that description since, at the time of his birth, his father was a British subject.

To read the rest of this story and the conclusion of why Obama does not qualify go to:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/justice-hugo-black-in-duncan-v-louisiana-indicates-obama-would-not-be-eligible-ineligibility-echoed-by-former-attorney-general-jeremiah-black

The Leo Donofrio website Natural Born Citizen is the most comprehensive website on this matter TO DATE.
Obama supporters LIVE IN STARK TERROR this matter will be pursued until the SCOTUS IS ALSO FORCED to address this matter once and for all.

In the end it will reach SCOTUS.
That is where the rubber actually meets the road. Will that be before or after the election of 2012.
It is indeed interesting times ahead.

Apparently Leo Donofrio has tracked down the naturalization papers of Chester Arthur’s father.

He was naturalized in New York State and became a United States citizen in August 1843. But Chester Arthur was born in 1829. Therefore, he was a British Citizen by descent, and a dual citizen at birth, if not his whole life.

He wasn’t a “natural born citizen” and he knew it.

Because Chester Arthur covered up his British citizenship, any precedent he might have set that the country has had a President born of an alien father is nullified completely as Chester Arthur was a usurper to the Presidency. He wouldn’t have been on the ticket if it was public knowledge. Nobody knew Arthur was a British subject because nobody looked in the right place for the truth.

And it’s no precedent to follow.

The story here

TO: CAPT XXXX XXXX, USNR (Ret.)
XXXXX XXXXXXX Association, Washington Office
Washington, DC 20002

Captain XXXXX,

Sir, as a fellow vet, I know you fully understand the obligation we accept when we say the words, “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.” As citizen soldiers, those words have special meaning to us. Our allegiance rises above party politics, a man or an institution. Our allegiance is to the US Constitution — that we “defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” To that end, I have a CALL TO ACTION for the XXXXX XXXXXXX Association, action that will not be easy, yet required to ensure the Rule of Law stays intact.

Former US Senator Barack Obama has openly acknowledged that his father was a Kenyan (British) citizen and his mother was an American citizen. At birth in 1961, Barack Obama (Jr) was a dual-citizen – he has confirmed this fact himself. When Barack Obama, Jr, was born in Hawaii, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama, Sr was a British Citizen, whose status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr‘s children.

As outlined in the British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): “Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.”

As a result, Barack Obama, Jr, IS a US citizen, but he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen as required by Article 2, Sect 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution. Note that the US Constitution outlines that Senators and Representative are required to be US Citizens to hold office. However, the office of President has the unique requirement of Natural Born Citizen. That prerequisite was specifically outlined by the Framers, hearkened by John Jay, the first Chief Justice, to ensure that our Commander in Chief would have “undivided loyalties” to uphold our nation’s interest.

It is unfortunate that the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission allowed this to happen, i.e., not vetting the qualifications of Candidate Barack Obama for the National Election. We are on the precipice of a Constitutional Crisis. Numerous lawsuits are docketed in the US Supreme Court at this time, including a closed-door Conference that has received little press coverage, DONOFRIO V. WELLS, docket# 08A407, which takes place Friday, December 5. Many other cases are coming from different venues, disputing Barack Obama’s birth records to lawsuits challenging various Secretaries of States for their Certification process. Donofrio’s case is unique and directly challenges Barack Obama’s former British citizenship. However, nothing is for sure in the courtroom, and the clock is ticking until judgment is rendered.

Those who wear the uniform are in a unique position. We are UNDER OATH to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.” We are the last line of defense against our enemies, and we put ourselves directly in harm’s ways at the direction of the Commander in Chief. While serving our nation, although we may not believe in the politics of the President, we follow his directions.

However, under UCMJ, we are to follow all LEGAL orders of our Commanding Officer. I dare say that if an illegitimate CINC holds office, our military may have some significant disorder following Barack Obama’s Inauguration on January 20. The potential of a breakdown in the military Chain of Command should shivers down the spine of any American, certainly those who understand how vulnerable it would make us to our enemies.

Many cases have been swept aside by lower courts for “lack of standing.” Military personnel actually do have the right, and duty, to request verification if there is doubt that the Commander in Chief does not meet Constitutional requirements to hold office. Such “questioning” is not governed by UCMJ Article 88 (Contempt toward Officials), DoD DIRECTIVE 1344.10 (Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces on Active Duty), or any other UCMJ Article or Directive I can find.

Captain XXXXX, I ask that you consult with attorneys in your network and ask them to review this – I think you’ll be surprised by their response. IT IS VITAL, SIR, THAT YOU UNDERSTAND: There IS a difference between a Citizen, and Natural Born Citizen — even if you are born on US Soil, especially if only ONE of your parents is an American Citizen. If you check online, you’ll find that many Constitutional lawyers are looking at this and agree we are headed toward a Constitutional crisis in the next few weeks. Unfortunately, it may fall on those of us are affected by this the most, the nation’s military, to keep this from happening.

Because military personnel are bound to the US Constitution by oath, it is believed by many of who are watching this situation that US Active Duty and Reservist have the legal standing to file lawsuits directly in the US Federal Court system. In doing so, these groups of Active Duty and/or Reservists can “fast track” this issue directly to the US Supreme Court to “Stay” the Electoral College vote that is to take place on December 15. Barack Obama is NOT President-Elect officially until the Electoral College meets and declares him so.

The Objective of these lawsuits is to have the US Supreme Court, or a significant portion of states’ Electoral College officials, investigate this further before Electoral College delegates from each state cast their votes on December 15. The 22nd Amendment would permit President George Bush to remain CINC until this issue is resolved.

Please note that AFTER the Electoral College votes on December 15, Congress would then certify the EC votes. Unfortunately, there is little reason to believe Congress has the “intestinal fortitude” to evaluate this properly before January 20 – they have NOT up to this point.

Sir, I know this is a sensitive situation, not lightly undertaken. It flirts with unconscionable topics like “political activity,” “chain of command,” and other deemed scandalous by opponents. However, overriding such concerns must be the issues of the “Rule of Law,” and specifically to us as military leaders, the “US Uniformed Services Oath of Office.”

It is neither unpatriotic nor insubordinate to ask of our civilian authorities: “If Barack Obama’s father was a British Citizen at the time of Barack Obama’s birth, is Barack Obama a “Natural Born Citizen” as the Constitution requires for the office of President?”

It will not be up to the US Military to decide the road for us ahead. However, if we don’t act IMMEDIATELY, I fear the officials who have the power to have the ability to stop this probable infraction of the US Constitution will not exercise the political courage to act.

COURAGE is a quality of which those in the US Military possess in abundance. NOW is the time to exercise that courage.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at XXX-XXX-XXXX.

Respectfully,

XXXX XXXXXXX

World Net Daily has organized a letter writing campaign to Fed Ex the SCOTUS utilizing the following headline at its web site:

“FED EX THE SUPREMES ABOUT OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY”

I must draw attention to the fact that the article which solicits these letters has not educated the public to my case. The actual text of the letter they are sending is fine, but the article which solicits participation is incorrect. Here is what it says:
“…there is only one way to make your voice heard in time for Friday’s preliminary hearing – overnight delivery of your letter.

“Join more than 145,000 others in signing WND’s online petition calling for release of Barack Obama’s birth certificate and verifying beyond any shadow of a doubt his constitutional eligibility for office. This offer ends Thursday at noon Eastern Time to ensure all letters are delivered by Friday morning to the Supreme Court.”

That language is just awful. No birth certificate can “verify beyond a shadow of a doubt his constitutional eligibility for office.” Please. WND is basically saying that if Obama shows an original BC, then his is eligible beyond a shadow of doubt. That is is false.

I have REPEATEDLY stated that Obama can release a golden birth certificate signed by 100 gazzillion witnesses embossed in gold leaf that he was born on the mall in Washington DC and it still wouldn’t make him a “Natural Born Citizen” under the Constitution because he was, regardless of where he was born, a BRITISH citizen “at birth.” Since he was “born” as a British citizen/subject, his United States citizenship was not “natural”. World Net Daily has done a prior article where they did get it right, but at this crucial moment, two days before the SCOTUS meets, they are getting it wrong.

The article goes on to say:

“Farah launched a petition drive on WND two weeks ago that calls on all controlling legal authorities to ensure the Constitution is followed on the question of eligibility and for full public disclosure of the facts of Obama’s birthplace and parentage…”

There is no dispute about Obama’s parentage. His father was a British Citizen, and his mother was a United States citizen. Therefore, Obama was both a subject/citizen of the British monarchy as well as a United States citizen “at birth”. His place of birth won’t change that no matter where he was born. The WND letter solicitation fails to point that out and as such is doing harm to public awarenesss.

Here’s why: if Obama produces a genuine vault kept birth certificate from Hawaii that satisfies every possible requirement, many people will be under the mistaken impression that he is a natural born citizen. World Net Daily needs to correct that solicitation and let its readers know that Obama is not eligible regardless of where he was born.

I must ask readers of this blog not to participate in that letter writing campaign. I don’t believe this was an intentional error, but I must remain consistent.

Who is reporting the monumental flap that has arisen over Barack Obama’s belligerence in turning over documentation proving “Natural Born Citizenship”?

Apparetly no one other than those of us here on the Internet.

Moment by moment a new spark has been ignited until we are now experiencing a full blown fire that CAN NOT be extinguished.

A smolder that could easily have been stopped the moment the DNC and Obama himself were requested to present proof.

For those of you who landed on this page from some search engine or elsewhere in cyberland … if you are lost START AT THE BEGINNING HERE.

So why has Barack Obama REFUSED to make full disclosure?
Why would he be party to keeping this fire fueled?
Has he now painted himself into a corner from where there is no escape short of a Supreme Court BAIL OUT?

No matter what happens now, he will FOREVER have this doubt hanging over his head no matter what the decisions are.

All of these questions are ones I have asked myself hundreds of times since before election day on 11/4/2008.
None of them have been answered in my own head and the news MEDIA REMAINS MISSING IN ACTION.

Apparently others are beginning to voice the same complaint. Here is a piece written by Joan Swirsky of the Tulsa Today News titled The Great Birth Certificate Scandal/Cover-Up of ‘08.
This is a very detailed article and well worth the read.

Little by little the public is beginning to understand how they have been led/herded like “Sheeple” into ignorance.

There is nothing to fuel the public into outrage and action faster than showing they have been made FOOLS of by the MEDIA and their GOVERNMENT.

Again “we the people” have trusted MEDIA to tell us what to think and PARROT.

So here we are today fighting one of the largest attacks on our US Constitution to date and NOT A PEEP from those who should be on it like “ugly on a stick”.

It makes Bill O’Reilly’s “I’m looking out for the folks” the joke of the century.
I say that being a fan of his since he hit Fox.

Well the next noteworthy process in this out of control fire storm is Leo Donofrio.

Out of all of the suits filed … that of Leo Donofrio appears to be the one most likely to stick like spaghetti to the wall.

So who is Leo Donofrio?

A young lawyer who was inactive and had never filed a lawsuit.

A resident of New York, NY

Is now a tournament poker player with the nickname of Jet Schizo.

He started playing Hold em poker in 2002 and has made it a goal to be the best tournament hold em player the world has ever seen.

Today he finds himself in the spotlight fighting the corruption of an Ohio State judge while his case is up for consideration by 9 Supreme Court Justices on Dec. 5th. IF Four of the Nine Justices favor review, A hearing will be held.

No doubt the Justices are not anxious to be involved in this mess and indeed world not find it necessary had the Secretaries of each State been doing their jobs.

It seems that when all of this started to surface on the internet Leo’s Blog sites started to have a problem. He has to date gone through 2 and now is hopefully on a server that is more secure.

Keep updated on the progress of Leo and his suits by visiting his web pages at:

Latest Blog
First Site where you will find all of the original documents filed.
Second site is on a Google spam alert even though every effort has been made to rectify this situation.

For those of you interested in listening to the recorded interview with Leo Donofrio on the Lan Lamphere Show … they are below.